My point is, and continues to be, that you’re using politics as a cover for unseemly and unmanly behavior. Your answer is to pretend I’m hysterical about it. You’re partially right, as your textbook latency and comical hypocrisy do leave me in hysterics. But don’t flatter yourself into thinking we’re debating anything other than how long it’ll be before you’re picked up on a domestic violence beef.

GSGF has a very successful shtick that helps her reach a lot of readers with her opinions. Sexy photos are part of that shtick. You don’t have to like what she’s doing. It just seems to me that your prudish reaction to the imagery on her site undermines your ideological arguments, whatever they may be.

And here’s a tip: don’t ever visit Theo Spark’s site. You might have to gouge your eyes out in a public display of puritanical righteousness.

I haven’t gone anywhere. Anyone who wants to comment on my blogs is cordially invited to do so. I even publish the insulting comments — and actually, those can be the most fun to rebut. I’ve published every one of GSGF’s comments at Conservative Heritage Times, even when she was ‘way out of line. But I’m used to it — you gotta develop a thick skin if you want to be a blogger.

Anyway, since you were (relatively) more civil than the excitable Mr. Taylor, I will agree to ask RSM to publish her response. She may take her best shot at me.

You are in the wrong here, Old Rebel – regardless of what you think of The Great Satan’s Girl Friend – to go out to a different site – slam her – then disappear when she’s banned from responding.

It is deceitful.

I think RSM didn’t have a clue what she was going on about – “confederate” and ‘totenkof” do seem confusing.

But I bet you knew. And you let it happen. Why? Are you so fearful of what her response might be?

Wouldn’t Southern Chivalry demand that you at least ask RSM to allow her a response?

Actually, I’m an equal-opportunity blogger who calls all sofa samurai and laptop bombardiers hypocrites. For example, you could check out Americaneocon’s comment sections, and you’ll see I’ve strenuously objected to his warmongering, too.

When someone starts debating by commenting on their site, as GSGF did on mine, they’re inviting rebuttal. No sane person can look at Great Satan Girlfriend’s site and not conclude that war is not only glamorized, but advocated, as she’s doing now against Iran, so “war porn” is apt.

You’re hallucinating. Again.

When did I call you a communist? You’ve dropped that laughable insult at me several times. Which is understandable, since you don’t have anything else.

However, when someone describes helpless peasants getting blasted by brave heroes in jet fighters with the caption, “Love it to Death,” I have to call that glorifying war and violence.