-Odinist, former poster at LGF

You sir are an idiot.

“I have a printer, but that doesn’t keep stuff cyberstored.”

You shouldn’t store stuff online anyway; it doesn’t actually keep your work safe. What I’m pointing out is that this is a nonsensical excuse for a grown man to have a MySpace page. Get a thumb drive. But don’t tell me you “need” to be on MySpace. Unless you’re promoting something MySpace is just a hobby.

“Why don’t you ask the Stormfront poster in question (if there’s only one, and if all the links were posted after Pam started cozying with eurtofascists – that second part makes sense, btw) whether he’s an LGF stooge, instead of dancing around your rancid insinuendoes? I’d like to see what he tells you to do and where he tells you to go.”

I don’t know what an insinuendo is but why should I chat with Nazis to make you feel good? It’s typical of White people like yourself to insensitively not only claim you know better than me what we Black folk should believe religiously but then assume I’d interact with people just like you (racists) to please you. Why don’t you ask CJ why a violent AFA affiliated communist is his main source for the fascist accusations he throws around? Oops. That would require you read CJ carefully and questioned your Internet daddy.

“I shared that story because you pulled your snide, snotty, sneering little ‘no wonder you’re divorced’ line out and waved it around like you’d pulled a plum out of a pie. Nothing takes the wind out of the sails of slagging blowhards like you more than a dose of personlly uncomfortable truth. It tends to show them up for the vapid and malicious jerks they are.”

No you shared that story because you have no dignity or pride or, as I said before, boundaries. The wind didn’t come out of my sail, but I have received several emails from “malicious Jerks” (as opposed to the non-malicious kind) who found that particular email instructive as to the type of person you are.

“YOU’RE the cyberstalker, just like your droogie minions at alla those other stalker blogs; I just decided to show your readers what a complete and total nimrod you ar on your own site.”

Droogie? Really? But what other blogs are you talking about. I personally don’t have or want “minions” and correspond with fans mainly by email. I don’t know of any stalker blogs, nor is pointing out that you have a long history of unseemly behavior, archived on the net, stalking.

“Charles doesn’t pay me or anyone I know jack. We’re there for intelligent, reasoned, referenced discussion, something that is rare in the blogosphere these days – it sure as hell can’t be found here. You yourself were booted from LGF because you lacked the capacity to restrain yourself to it.”

Says the man who came here to call me an Uncle Tom, claim I’m a Black Nazi and who called me a pedophile before the subject was even broached. It this is you being well reasoned I’d hate to see you angry.

“All people have to do to discover who slagged who first and how is to read this thread, and I heartily invite them to do it. That’ll put the quietus on your lie, unless you monkey with the posts, something that I wouldn’t put past you after your display here so far.”

Yes, and they’ll see in your very first post, when CJ sent you scurrying over here to defend his honor, you implied I was less educated than you (despite the fact I have a Masters, where’s your Masters from by the way) and it was you yourself who initiated the name calling by calling me a racist, pedophile etc. Perhaps it is you who should read through the comments and think about how you represent yourself in the future.

“A lot of different folks from all over the spectrum link to bigger blogs, while the clientele for smaller ones tends to be more niche oriented and appeal-specialized. So when racists link to smaller blogs, it means more.”

That’s asinine. First of all I believe Atlas gets tens of thousands of hits a day so the “smaller blog” stuff is relative. Secondly I get a large variety of readers, that’s how the Internet works, even Tila Tequila apparently is a fan since she linked here just recently, I’ll say because I happen to like dropping names. For someone who claims to be so logical this argument of yours seems to be less than well thought out. It does conveniently let you judge your favorite blog by completely different standards than all others.

What’s the word for that? Oh yeah, hypocrisy.

“Those Stormfronters don’t have to call Pam a hero; they’re agreeing with her posted opinions – something that should deeply trouble her, and you, but doesn’t seem to, in either case. Wonder why that is?”

The racist Odinist movement you so despise agrees with you that biracial people can’t worship Odin. Doesn’t that bother you?

Many Nazis are anti-Creationism just as you are, doesn’t that bother you?

I wonder why that is?

So a cached copy of an Australian Stormfront thread that was removed by the site proves that they are heroes of Stormfront? By that logic LGF is the hero of Canadian Neo-Nazis for being linked to by the Canadian Nationalists I’ve mentioned.

Show me where, in their words, they support any of what you claim and how frankly disliking Islam (I certainly do, but then against they still burn Witches around Mecca) equates with racism? Why haven’t you linked to the Kries Faction of the Aryan Nations allowing Muslims to recruit on their site?

http://www.red-alerts.com/un-a.....n-nations/

Or there is this Stormfront post that went up recently defending the “values of the burqua” and how Muslims get it right. How does this square with your Nazis hate Jihadism nonsense?

http://www.stormfront.org/foru.....p?t=588039

Or this article about the Aryan Nations reaching out to Al-Qaeda from CNN

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/.....index.html

The White nationalists have reached out to Muslims since 2001, something I’ve written about extensively. But since I had to link to those sites to prove it by your logic I’m supporting them. But then against since you guys keep linking to Stormfront (and apparently reading them) you must support them, no?

But what does this have to do with the post I wrote? Or can you argue those points at all. If you want to argue with Robert Spencer and Pam Geller go to their sites. If you want to argue my points stop pretending I’m a Biracial neo-Nazi (as if you two aren’t racists who cross the street when you see some Black kids) and use the point I actually make-people like yourself sneer at creationists because it’s the only way you can feel better about yourselves. The fact that you guys will troll a blog for two days in my mind pretty much proves that.

Never mind they think he’s a god at stormfront.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=.....ent=safari

But regardless- which do you think is worse? That pam and bob are supported on stormfront, or the fact that their support of european ethnic nationalists makes them favorites at stormfront?

Why don’t you ask the Stormfront poster in question (if there’s only one, and if all the links were posted after Pam started cozying with eurtofascists – that second part makes sense, btw) whether he’s an LGF stooge, instead of dancing around your rancid insinuendoes? I’d like to see what he tells you to do and where he tells you to go.

I shared that story because you pulled your snide, snotty, sneering little ‘no wonder you’re divorced’ line out and waved it around like you’d pulled a plum out of a pie. Nothing takes the wind out of the sails of slagging blowhards like you more than a dose of personlly uncomfortable truth. It tends to show them up for the vapid and malicious jerks they are.

YOU’RE the cyberstalker, just like your droogie minions at alla those other stalker blogs; I just decided to show your readers what a complete and total nimrod you ar on your own site.

Charles doesn’t pay me or anyone I know jack. We’re there for intelligent, reasoned, referenced discussion, something that is rare in the blogosphere these days – it sure as hell can’t be found here. You yourself were booted from LGF because you lacked the capacity to restrain yourself to it.

All people have to do to discover who slagged who first and how is to read this thread, and I heartily invite them to do it. That’ll put the quietus on your lie, unless you monkey with the posts, something that I wouldn’t put past you after your display here so far.

A lot of different folks from all over the spectrum link to bigger blogs, while the clientele for smaller ones tends to be more niche oriented and appeal-specialized. So when racists link to smaller blogs, it means more.

Those Stormfronters don’t have to call Pam a hero; they’re agreeing with her posted opinions – something that should deeply trouble her, and you, but doesn’t seem to, in either case. Wonder why that is?

So you don’t have a printer, thumb drive, DVD burner etc. Sure. Makes sense.

“I’m claiming that Stormfront finds many of Pam Gellers’ posts to be amensble enough to their own views that they have linked to them, hundreds of times. This is indisputably the case. Nazis are indeed extremists by definition. It would not seem to require the full six degrees of internet separation between you and european fascist sympathizers.”

That’s a lie. There are no “hundreds of times” just a Google page full of links to the Obama birth certificate story. All from a poster who joined Stormfront shortly after Charles Johnson started calling Pam a Nazi. Hmmm.

“I am divorced because, after eight yars of marriage, my wife came to the realization that she was a repressed lesbian (insert your bigoted remarks about my manhood here). I did not oppose the divorce, even though I loved her dearly, because when you tryly love someone, you want what’s best for them, even if that doesn’t happen to be you any more. She and her partner are friends of mine.”

And you share that sort of story online because, as I’ve been implying, you lack the boundaries a normal person of your advanced years should have. But if you want me to respond I’ll simply say I’m 37, been with my old lady almost 20 years and I would put forward that you should maybe spend less time at LGF and MySpace and more finding a nice Wiccan to settle down with. That way you wouldn’t be so tempted to call me an Uncle Tom, you know because you’d be happy and not a bitter spiteful troll.

“My employment is at home, on the computer, and this allows me the freedom to dictate my own flex time. There are many others in this copuntry who can say the same.”

Oh does Charles pay you by the comment?

“Your imbecilic ad hominems would seem to simply reflect your own secret and perverse erotic desires (and perhaps practices); they have nothing to do with me.”

Says the man who called me pedophile out of the blue. But explain which of my attacks were ad hominem? You attacked me rather than debate what I said (literal ad hominem) when you first showed up, and none of my attacks on you were in lieu of debating your points. Perhaps you should learn Latin before throwing it around. But if they were ad hominem which ones reflect my perverse sexual desires? And what desires are those? Do tell, unless of course this was simply an…ad hominem attack.

“LGF is a major internet blog; everybody and their cousin links to them. this is beyond LGF’s control. You cannot claim that LGF itself links to such sites. You and Atlas Shrugs are much smaller, and the array of blogs that link to you are much more…umm…selective…as are those to whom you voluntarily link.”

This is nonsense in it’s most basic form. Smaller blogs can in someway select who links to them than bigger blogs? Do you think we have the power to stop any weirdo who want to link to us from copying our URL and pasting on his page? I have been linked to by people who claim I’m a CIA agent working for the Illuminati but by your logic I wanted them to say that.

You yourself wrote neo-Nazis linking to Atlas proves that she shares their ideas. But because LGF is bigger than Atlas the same rule doesn’t apply? That’s a load of crap and you know it. The Canadian Nationalists link to LGF because they agree with Charles Johnson’s stance on something. That doesn’t mean CJ agrees with them. By the same token just because someone links to Atlas doesn’t mean she agrees.

And as usual you’re deflecting. Where in those threads did those Nazis call her a hero, as your fellow LGFers claim? Tell me tomorrow, I’m done for the night.

I have a MySpace page so I will have an off-puter place to park my poetry, short stories, and philosophical essays, so I don’t have to retype them in if my hard drive fries.

I’m claiming that Stormfront finds many of Pam Gellers’ posts to be amensble enough to their own views that they have linked to them, hundreds of times. This is indisputably the case. Nazis are indeed extremists by definition. It would not seem to require the full six degrees of internet separation between you and european fascist sympathizers.

I am divorced because, after eight yars of marriage, my wife came to the realization that she was a repressed lesbian (insert your bigoted remarks about my manhood here). I did not oppose the divorce, even though I loved her dearly, because when you tryly love someone, you want what’s best for them, even if that doesn’t happen to be you any more. She and her partner are friends of mine.

My employment is at home, on the computer, and this allows me the freedom to dictate my own flex time. There are many others in this copuntry who can say the same.

Your imbecilic ad hominems would seem to simply reflect your own secret and perverse erotic desires (and perhaps practices); they have nothing to do with me.

LGF is a major internet blog; everybody and their cousin links to them. this is beyond LGF’s control. You cannot claim that LGF itself links to such sites. You and Atlas Shrugs are much smaller, and the array of blogs that link to you are much more…umm…selective…as are those to whom you voluntarily link.

You are claiming a Jew is in league with Nazis, I’m a Biracial Nazi and everyone who doesn’t agree with Charles is a Nazi but we’re the extremists?

No wonder your divorced.

Tell me. Is trolling blogs pretty much your whole life? I mean, you clearly aren’t going to work tomorrow since you’re still up. Weird.

Let me guess, you’re either unemployed or work as an adjunct? You use Wicca as an in with young gals, telling them you’ll “initiate” them into the craft, and you have literally been angered by our exchange. Did I pretty much nail it?

I notice none of this has to do with the actual article I wrote. No criticism there I suppose? What about the piece I linked to where I showed Canadain neo-Nazis blogrolling your preciously moderate LGF. No self-righteous indignation about that?

And gratuitously hauling out the lefty canard is hilarious; LGF is not known to be a leftist site except to the extreme fascist Right. They are considered to be right-wingnuts by the leftists. When you piss off both extremes, it must mean you inhabit the sensible center. The same center that antijihadis who associate with euroneonazis irrevocably lose.

To be able to lie down with such supremacist-flea-ridden dogs as most Odinists are, and get up flea-free would have to entail an industrial strength flea collar. Just as to lie down with euroneonazis and get up untainted by them would. I most sincerely doubt that your flea collar is that effective, or that you care.

Go ahead and slag me all you want; I simply consider the source, but no more than it merits and deserves, which, in your case, is not much at all. Such things reveal much more about their sources than they reveal about their targets, and what they reveal is far from complimentary.

If I could buy your opinions for what they are worth and sell them for what you think they are worth, I would be a wealthy man.