Comments on: The New Misogyny: Carrie Prejean a “Hypocrite” for Incredibly Tame Modeling Photos http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/ Vigilance is the best deterrence Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:06:44 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Keean http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-60672 Keean Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:27:39 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-60672 Carrie Prejean is a girl that deserves to win the title that she won. She maybe against gay marriage but we should respect her opinion. Carrie Prejean is a girl that deserves to win the title that she won. She maybe against gay marriage but we should respect her opinion.

]]> By: Rob Taylor http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-60574 Rob Taylor Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:36:48 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-60574 But she's not naked. She's in a bathing suit, literally modeling fashion like you claim is a model's job (although there were models well before the fashion industry, for painters and sculptors. Not that illiterates like you would know that). It's odd to see so many people who claim to be open minded but are in fact prudes. I notice your ire isn't up over the defense of Polanski, who FORCIBLY raped a child anally and vaginally then was able to plead out to statutory rape. Even then he skipped out on bail. But you're still complaining about some model you disagree with. I guess fake breasts are bad, child rape is good in the minds of backwards hillbillies like you. By the way, take the footnote out when you're copying and pasting things you don't actually know yourself. But she’s not naked. She’s in a bathing suit, literally modeling fashion like you claim is a model’s job (although there were models well before the fashion industry, for painters and sculptors. Not that illiterates like you would know that). It’s odd to see so many people who claim to be open minded but are in fact prudes.

I notice your ire isn’t up over the defense of Polanski, who FORCIBLY raped a child anally and vaginally then was able to plead out to statutory rape. Even then he skipped out on bail. But you’re still complaining about some model you disagree with. I guess fake breasts are bad, child rape is good in the minds of backwards hillbillies like you.

By the way, take the footnote out when you’re copying and pasting things you don’t actually know yourself.

]]> By: josephine http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-60570 josephine Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:14:11 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-60570 Actually it's pretty obvious that models don't need to take off their clothes. A model (from Middle French modèle)[1], sometimes called a mannequin, is a person who is employed for the purpose of displaying and promoting fashion clothing. In today's society, it is also obvious that sex sells, and if she wants to sell that along with her fake breasts, then she better get off her high horse. If someone is putting themselves out in the media in a competition to be judged, then they will be judged. Period. Get over it. Actually it’s pretty obvious that models don’t need to take off their clothes.

A model (from Middle French modèle)[1], sometimes called a mannequin, is a person who is employed for the purpose of displaying and promoting fashion clothing.

In today’s society, it is also obvious that sex sells, and if she wants to sell that along with her fake breasts, then she better get off her high horse.

If someone is putting themselves out in the media in a competition to be judged, then they will be judged. Period. Get over it.

]]> By: Sabia http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-57997 Sabia Tue, 26 May 2009 01:34:49 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-57997 I believe people who are condemning her for these "raunchy" photographs are stereotyping her. See I believe a lot of lefties have this warped perception of Christians and believe that they believe that they are walking perfection. No where in the bible did it say Christians were perfect. If some people actually took the time to read the bible instead of skimming through it like a shallow magazine, condemning scripture after scripture, they wouldn't stereotype at all. Now you have people who don't even uphold these Christian morals telling people who do , how to act, and what their career choices should be. And where were these pro-women groups when this happened? She got called a bitch and a cunt, and those words are derogatory names for a woman. You can get up in arms about Imus calling females "Nappy-Headed-Hoes", but when homosexual Perez calls a woman those names, nothing is said? His reasons for not wanting her to win were purely emotionally-based , and had no real reasons other than that she gave the answer he didn't want. I think I am one of the few people who does not have a hard-on for Carrie. This is an excellent entry. I guess this has died out though. Later.Lol. I believe people who are condemning her for these “raunchy” photographs are stereotyping her. See I believe a lot of lefties have this warped perception of Christians and believe that they believe that they are walking perfection. No where in the bible did it say Christians were perfect. If some people actually took the time to read the bible instead of skimming through it like a shallow magazine, condemning scripture after scripture, they wouldn’t stereotype at all. Now you have people who don’t even uphold these Christian morals telling people who do , how to act, and what their career choices should be.

And where were these pro-women groups when this happened? She got called a bitch and a cunt, and those words are derogatory names for a woman. You can get up in arms about Imus calling females “Nappy-Headed-Hoes”, but when homosexual Perez calls a woman those names, nothing is said? His reasons for not wanting her to win were purely emotionally-based , and had no real reasons other than that she gave the answer he didn’t want.

I think I am one of the few people who does not have a hard-on for Carrie. This is an excellent entry. I guess this has died out though. Later.Lol.

]]> By: Rob Taylor http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-57823 Rob Taylor Tue, 12 May 2009 19:58:05 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-57823 What part of the Bible claims you can't be a model? The vain reference would include those who vainly judge other Christians wouldn't it? Judge not lest you be judged my dear, so aren't you a hypocrite for passing judgment on your fellow Christian which, according to your own doctrine, is the sole purview of God? What part of the Bible claims you can’t be a model? The vain reference would include those who vainly judge other Christians wouldn’t it?

Judge not lest you be judged my dear, so aren’t you a hypocrite for passing judgment on your fellow Christian which, according to your own doctrine, is the sole purview of God?

]]> By: MVK http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-57820 MVK Tue, 12 May 2009 18:32:14 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-57820 She has fake boobs. When her motivation of a person undergoing surgery is that of vanity, she has become his or her own idol. The Bible warns us not to be vain or conceited (Philippians 2:3-4) and not to draw attention to ourselves by the way we look (1 Timothy 2:9). Thats why she is a hypocrite. It has nothing to do with Perez Hilton or his boyfriends. She is a hypocrite for picking and choosing which parts of the Bible to follow blindly while ignoring others that pertain to her actual life. Sadly this is a common occurance in the American faith today. She has fake boobs. When her motivation of a person undergoing surgery is that of vanity, she has become his or her own idol. The Bible warns us not to be vain or conceited (Philippians 2:3-4) and not to draw attention to ourselves by the way we look (1 Timothy 2:9).

Thats why she is a hypocrite. It has nothing to do with Perez Hilton or his boyfriends. She is a hypocrite for picking and choosing which parts of the Bible to follow blindly while ignoring others that pertain to her actual life. Sadly this is a common occurance in the American faith today.

]]> By: Perezhiltop http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-57776 Perezhiltop Fri, 08 May 2009 19:39:32 +0000 http://www.red-alerts.com/the-death-of-manliness/the-new-misogyny-carrie-pejean-a-hypocrite-for-incredibly-tame-modeling-photos/#comment-57776 My question is, where is the National Organization for Women? Here is a situation where a woman spoke her opinion in a completely unoffensive manner, and for that, she has been called a whore and a bimbo. NOW's silence is yet another example of how hypocritical they are. They only care about protecting radical leftist women and lesbians. If you happen to be a woman who doesn't toe the party line, you're fair game because these self-proclaimed defenders of women's rights not only won't defend you, they'll join in the misogyny. They are nothing but a bunch of radical leftist harpies. This is also why they refused to condemn Bill Clinton for being a sexual harasser and womanizer. More important than Prejean's lack of attire is the fact that everyone is starting to realize that the Emperor has no clothes. My question is, where is the National Organization for Women? Here is a situation where a woman spoke her opinion in a completely unoffensive manner, and for that, she has been called a whore and a bimbo. NOW’s silence is yet another example of how hypocritical they are. They only care about protecting radical leftist women and lesbians. If you happen to be a woman who doesn’t toe the party line, you’re fair game because these self-proclaimed defenders of women’s rights not only won’t defend you, they’ll join in the misogyny.

They are nothing but a bunch of radical leftist harpies. This is also why they refused to condemn Bill Clinton for being a sexual harasser and womanizer. More important than Prejean’s lack of attire is the fact that everyone is starting to realize that the Emperor has no clothes.

]]>