<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Tanked our Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mah29001</title>
		<link>http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-26636</link>
		<dc:creator>mah29001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/#comment-26636</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s high time that Blue Dog Democrats and fiscally responsible Republicans ought to form their own party.  Thereby making it impossible for either a Obama or McCain administration to have any spending programs at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s high time that Blue Dog Democrats and fiscally responsible Republicans ought to form their own party.  Thereby making it impossible for either a Obama or McCain administration to have any spending programs at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-26626</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/#comment-26626</guid>
		<description>Paulson sucks but did he support ethonol mandates which lower fuel economy and raise the prices of food? Did he create the subprime market or did Jimmy Carter with the Community Redevelopment Act? Was it Paulson who looted Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or was it Democrat loyalists like Franklin Raines?

As for me being stupid, What&#039;s your Masters in Strauss? Since you like splitting hairs, claiming I&#039;m stupid because I posted a quote from a Libertarian for discussion that  agree with, let&#039;s try this:

You&#039;re using a post on my blog to then generalize to all Republicans, what&#039;s that called? 

And why repeat points verbatim in my comments? Gaming Google? I wonder how many other sites I&#039;ll find this exact quote? Oh look 27.

Ridiculous. I&#039;m deleting your second comment, which for readers is paragraph five of his first post.

Here&#039;s another question for you. If peoples incomes are going down why haven&#039;t they curbed spending? Why aren&#039;t more people, aside from well to do Whites who are spoiled and childlike, complaining about making &quot;less money.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulson sucks but did he support ethonol mandates which lower fuel economy and raise the prices of food? Did he create the subprime market or did Jimmy Carter with the Community Redevelopment Act? Was it Paulson who looted Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or was it Democrat loyalists like Franklin Raines?</p>
<p>As for me being stupid, What&#8217;s your Masters in Strauss? Since you like splitting hairs, claiming I&#8217;m stupid because I posted a quote from a Libertarian for discussion that  agree with, let&#8217;s try this:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re using a post on my blog to then generalize to all Republicans, what&#8217;s that called? </p>
<p>And why repeat points verbatim in my comments? Gaming Google? I wonder how many other sites I&#8217;ll find this exact quote? Oh look 27.</p>
<p>Ridiculous. I&#8217;m deleting your second comment, which for readers is paragraph five of his first post.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another question for you. If peoples incomes are going down why haven&#8217;t they curbed spending? Why aren&#8217;t more people, aside from well to do Whites who are spoiled and childlike, complaining about making &#8220;less money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stocks and Bonds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Democrats Tanked our Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-26607</link>
		<dc:creator>Stocks and Bonds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Democrats Tanked our Economy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/#comment-26607</guid>
		<description>[...] When the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate back in January of 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at an all-time high of 12400 and gas prices hovered around $2.15 per gallon. &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate back in January of 2007, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was at an all-time high of 12400 and gas prices hovered around $2.15 per gallon. &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-26598</link>
		<dc:creator>smrstrauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/#comment-26598</guid>
		<description>This is called the fallacy of â€œafter therefore because of,â€ or â€œpost hock ergo propter hocâ€ in Latin. You learn not to make such arguments in the first days of debate class, or classes in logic, or rhetoric, or philosophy.

Why not? Because, if you make such an argument, and your audience realizes that that is what you are saying, then it thinks that you consider it to be stupid.

â€œAfter therefore because ofâ€ arguments run along these lines:  â€œEver since we moved to Boston, the Red Socks have had winning seasons. We caused it.â€ Or, the classic: â€œWe carried an umbrella today, so naturally it didnâ€™t rain.â€

Recognize the parallel to â€œThese things have gone bad since the Democrats took office?â€

In fact, Henry Paulson took over as Secretary of the US Treasury in June 2006, so you could equally date all the declines in the US economy from then. He took over in June 2006, oil prices increased since then, unemployment increased since thenâ€”etc. Or, you could date all the economic woes from the surge in Iraq, which also happened about two years ago.

The Republicans must be pretty desperate to resort to such â€œafter therefore because ofâ€ arguments. Or perhaps they think we are stupid.

Or, perhaps they think we forget that the economy was already on the decline in late 2006, before the Democrats took control.

For example, by February 2007, less than one month after the new congress was sworn in, the rate of real income per family was calculated as having declined by $1,273 per family under Bush, meaning that each year an average family had $1,273 less to get along on after calculating rising inflation. Real per-family income had increased by $5,825 per family under Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is called the fallacy of â€œafter therefore because of,â€ or â€œpost hock ergo propter hocâ€ in Latin. You learn not to make such arguments in the first days of debate class, or classes in logic, or rhetoric, or philosophy.</p>
<p>Why not? Because, if you make such an argument, and your audience realizes that that is what you are saying, then it thinks that you consider it to be stupid.</p>
<p>â€œAfter therefore because ofâ€ arguments run along these lines:  â€œEver since we moved to Boston, the Red Socks have had winning seasons. We caused it.â€ Or, the classic: â€œWe carried an umbrella today, so naturally it didnâ€™t rain.â€</p>
<p>Recognize the parallel to â€œThese things have gone bad since the Democrats took office?â€</p>
<p>In fact, Henry Paulson took over as Secretary of the US Treasury in June 2006, so you could equally date all the declines in the US economy from then. He took over in June 2006, oil prices increased since then, unemployment increased since thenâ€”etc. Or, you could date all the economic woes from the surge in Iraq, which also happened about two years ago.</p>
<p>The Republicans must be pretty desperate to resort to such â€œafter therefore because ofâ€ arguments. Or perhaps they think we are stupid.</p>
<p>Or, perhaps they think we forget that the economy was already on the decline in late 2006, before the Democrats took control.</p>
<p>For example, by February 2007, less than one month after the new congress was sworn in, the rate of real income per family was calculated as having declined by $1,273 per family under Bush, meaning that each year an average family had $1,273 less to get along on after calculating rising inflation. Real per-family income had increased by $5,825 per family under Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-26584</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/democrats-tanked-our-economy/#comment-26584</guid>
		<description>Interesting that you have this--tonight, after the debate, there was a post-debate talk at Washington University in St. Louis (where I attend university).  The liberals actually try to blame the bad economy on deregulation, while in actuality their plans for regulation are just going to mess it up more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you have this&#8211;tonight, after the debate, there was a post-debate talk at Washington University in St. Louis (where I attend university).  The liberals actually try to blame the bad economy on deregulation, while in actuality their plans for regulation are just going to mess it up more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

