And reading “Men’s News Daily” is kinda gay no? It’s like the Taliban and their Mens only this and that, then as I’ve reported earlier turns out most of them were nailing each other.

Until you admit the attraction to dating abroad you seem like you’re blowing smoke up my and everyone elses ass. Even on the websites you shil for it claims that these women are easier to get along with which is a code aimed at men who can’t get along in a normal relationship. You know this.

I lived in NYC and CT (a college town) and am from NJ. None of these areas, with the exception of Women’s studies programs and Lesbian bars were “no-go” zones for straight guys. Scratch that, I went to a Lesbian bar with my friend from High school (a lesbian) and was treated just as well as at the local bar.

I also met my wife in NYC and have been with her since 1990. There’s no way a normal man, one who has dignity, self confidence and is comfortable being himself, can not score in NYC. I ran around in a real tree hat and a GOP t-shirt and still got plenty of women flirting with me. I’m happily married so I had to decline, but if i wasn’t NYC wouldn’t be a no-go zone.

Guy, you’re basically recycling conspiracy theories. You’re worried that women will have to “approve” of you before you could hit on them? Do you even know how retarded that sounds?

If you traveled and picked up women in other countries it would be different. Don’t you realize how degrading it is to men to date on-line? Don’t you think that the truth is people raise their eyebrows at you having a hissy fit about having to prove you’re not a rapist is because clearly you have a record? Do you really think we’re all so stupid as to be fooled by your human rights violation nonsense?

Just be a man and say “Hey, we guys that”ve been in the joint deserve russian braods too” and I might agree with you. Claim it’s a feminist conspiracy and it just proves you should be alone.

Have fun dying alone.

Orwell’s “1984″ described the forces that would create the IMBRA law. It is not a law that punishes known sex offenders but, rather, all people who would want to communicate with other people without the US government stepping in and forcing a background check for either party before the first hello.

IMBRA is a gateway law that the liberals (feminists) want to establish in order to regulate males on big corporate dating sites like Match.com.

After that, maybe in another 10 years, American men will be told that they cannot talk to any American woman in bars and other public places unless she first approves (his background can be checked via his national ID bracelet or whatever).

However, since you just said several times that you do not support IMBRA and really don’t care about it, there is no use in continuing the discussion.

However, when one refers to your “hating others”, I can point to your continued repetition of the non sequitur that a man who dates in other countries somehow cannot get a date in the USA.

I don’t see the logic in making the assumption that a man cannot do both.

And I don’t see why you are OK with the many feminists that make certain cities of the US (Boston, San Francisco) into no-go zones for heterosexual males who want a decent partner.

Heck, you wannabe a Republican but you have no opinion on feminists and their “Domestic Violence Industry”. Any heterosexual Republican male should be reading Mens News Daily to see what the feminists are up to these days.

But you have helped cement a key concept for the upcoming court challenge: It must be shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no mutual exclusivity between dating one woman abroad while dating an American woman at the same time.

You have shown that it is paramount to make sure that guys are not pegged as a separate subset of the American population just because they have passports and travel now and then.

Why do you think that me saying I don’t give a shit about IMBRA being passed means I’m envious of a man who dates on-line. Dig it you date on-line it’s nothing to be proud of. Are you saying I envy your inability to find happiness with a woman without going to extremes or your delusional vision of yourself as a “Indian Jones or James Bond” type?

I have a stats package that tells me where my traffic comes from and I can visit them. On two forums at least, one Ron Paul forum and one of your dating “rights” forums you’v told people to come here because I’m a supporter of IMBRA (not true) I’m a Clinton or Guiliani supporter (not true) and I hate men. Why you feel the need to lie about this is proof that your relationships fail because of your dishonesty and asinine behavior.

I can also see the i.p addresses of those commenting.

If you really think only hatred would cause people to support IMBRA, then again you’re revealing a paranoia that is likely the root cause of your inability to date women in a country that’s 51% women (look a real statistic) and where sex is easy to be had. I don’t care about IMBRA either way, but I do support sex offender registration and public databases available to parents/homebuyers/businesses so that they can decide if an area is good place to live, or so that a person can check out a potential paramour. Notice I say people, because there are plenty of female sex offenders that men should be aware of.

Am I driven by hatred? Is my desire to know prior to moving to an area how many sex offenders are in an area, or what the crime stats there in general, driven by hatred? Or are you just an over reacting prissy?

And didn’t you claim that the woman who got murdered who is used to promote this law (Anastaisia King) was a “jerk” who got what was coming to her? Why isn’t that evidence of hatred?

The only torturing going on here is you, in common with many leftists, stretching the Orwell metaphor thin indeed. Yes or no, a rapist or pedophile, who has broken contract with America, deserves to have his access to certain rights curtailed so that Americans, and future Americaans in this case, can enjoy their rights to lif, liberty and the persuit of happiness?

After you answer that, get lost Jim. I have a business to run, I’m not so lonely that I need to be involved in a two week conversation about something that I don’t care about.

And either/or neither/nor.

Because, apart from the Right to Assemble loss of rights to the American (who could be a woman wanting to meet a French man), IMBRA forces the foreigner to waste time doing paperwork that causes communication to never happen. Americans, with jobs back in the US, often do not have more than 3 days over a weekend to spend in a foreign country. If the foreigner does not check email in those three days, she or he will not know there is someone in her country who wants to meet her. There would have been communication if the American had been able to phone her like she originally had wanted Americans to do. Considering that Americans often only visit a particular foreign country once in a lifetime, IMBRA, thus, completely and totally destroys all possibilities of people meeting each other.

What Delphi is saying, is that only a feeling of hatred can cause someone to want to stop meetings from ever happening at all.

There needs to be at least a waiver for foreigners to sign that says “I do not want the US government meddling in my supposed security. I want anyone and everyone to be able to phone me”.

The women lose their rights to broadcast even their own email address if that is what they want. It takes 20 seconds to create an email address. No need for the US government to step in and say “You cannot give just anybody that email address.” It is a woman’s right to determine her own level of security. The US government has no authority to step in and tell a foreigner on her own soil how to behave and how not to behave.

Read the book “1984″. In the book, the government breaks up a relationship between a man and a woman by disclosing to the woman something the man said under torture. You can say the woman could have used the information that her boyfriend sais “Do this to her” (torture her instead of me), but the entire theme of the book was that the government had no right to either torture him to get him to say it NOR tell her that he had said that.

George Orwell, who wrote the book, was a conservative. In fact, Orwell died of cancer while being stressed out that left wingers were using his words to condemn the Vietnam War which he approved of (and which I believe was a necessary war).

But if you did, you would point out that men who can afford to fly overseas are usually successful enough financially that they can do very well dating in the USA as well. The average guy is 35 and the opposite of fat and bald. Married men often feel the need to stop other men from dating. This is especially true when the married man doesn’t want admit to being envious.

You obviously can’t have an adult conversation about law and government. You are a complete waste of time.

If you love these women so much (and not being in a relationship where the woman is has no options to leave you except beg you for a divorce and a plane ticket) why would you be against ensuring one of them doesn’t unkowingly hook up with a rapist/pedophile/murderer? These women should be able to make a choice based on all available info, no?

And are you saying that me pointing out that it’s immature at best for someone our age to claim to be “in love” with some girl young enough to be our daughters is the same as racism? Not only is that asinine and offnesive, but that kind of “critical thinking” probably explains your inability to have adult relationships.

Or am I wrong?

And I will admit to a strong dislike to certain types of “men”, mainly the ones who cry like little bitches every time someone is critical of them. You and your friends are really pieces of work having hissy fits with me because I won’t tell you what you want to hear.

I never heard of this stupid law until one of you fat, bald bastards who can’t get laid in America came here, tears welling up in his eyes as he typed away while sitting in his parnets attic, accusing me of all kinds of things. Guess what? Now I will support the law just to spite you.

I already had twenty of my friends and family write letters to their reps in support of IMBRA. And I’ll do everything I can to get it passed until you and your Ron Paul supporting flunkies stop telling people on the various on-line forums that I’m a “Clinton/Guilliani supporter” or a “radical feminist”

Hows about you be a man, a real man, and stop bad mouthing me all over the net like a 12 year old girl. Then maybe you’d get rational people to hear you out.

Moron.