AND, Many 13 year old girls are pre-pubescent, and in my opinion should not be considered “fair game” just because some other countries where women are still considered sex objects and little else think it’s ok to have sex with a 13 year old sex slave.

Dicks do penetrate people… dicks attached to people who make choices… by having this material so readily available for pedophiles to access… are we handing over our children? Doesn’t the mere suggestion that they are promoting pedophilia bother the powers that be over at the youtube headquarters?? It’s almost as through this is just becoming one more perversion that is acceptable in our society, we have already graduated to a plethora of mutilation and gore in our cinema, and on video games, there is nothing off limits these days. We are desensitizing ourselves (successfully) to a multitutde of inhuman evils, do we really want to make child molestation or exploitation one of them?

And to the young woman, I am assuming it was a woman, who stated that “slutty girls” would be slutty no matter what… you’re a sorry excuse for a woman. Many young women act out in search of male approval and acceptance because society dictates that a woman is not desirable as more than a sex object, and to be of value to a man a woman should present herself as one. These girls are not old enough to understand that this is even what they are doing, so is it ok to exploit them further, or should we at least attempt to protect our children, save the next generation from some of the mistakes we made, and preserve some of their innocence so that this society has a chance of remaining intact for our children’s children?

But that’s an aside. Saying there are no 13 year olds on YouTube because they aren’t allowed to register is either disingenuous or indicative of a profound misunderstanding of the Internet. Is YouTube sending out police to ensure the users ages?

Adults “interested” in adolescents are taking advantage of children. I have worked with adolescents for years and at 36 I can tell you that a 16 year old girl not only looks to young for me, but having had to be in the endless conversations about their teen concerns, I find adolescents endlessly boring. And I like kids, don’t get me worng, but I fail to see how it is possible for you to claim I’m backward for wanting to have romantic relationships with an equal, someone my own age who shares a similar amount of life experience.

Adults who want to date teen girls, (and I’ve seen them) are without exception people who are deficient in some aspect. Mybe they don’t have much going for them and they think kids won’t recognize that, maybe they’re too immature to relate to an adult, or maybe their predators who want to take advantage of the inexperienced. But it is the adult who can’t form healthy relationships with other adults who is “backward”, the adult who prefers the company o non-adults who is regressive.

Is England full of pedophiles? Uh. Yes, I’ve blogged that before, including a report from your own Times (or was it the BBC) where it was exposed that gangs of adult men were cruising malls for adolescents, “seducing” them (which involved plying them with your harmless drugs) then forcing them into prostitution. The same thing happens here by the way and most people forced into prostitution who aren’t illegal immigrants start off under 18 and are turned out by adults.

Let me ask you something, most of the searchs that lead to this page involve soome combination of the term young, teen and rape. Is it your position that these people are normal? If your 16 year old daughter told you she was going to be nailing a 30 year old would you say “Well, he’s not a pedophile!” or would you think there was something wrong with the guy. What if she was 15? How about 13?

The only thing your post clearly illustrates is the hypocritical desire by you to make a distinction between predatory behaviors that both, in my book, go back to a sadism on the perpetrators part. Men who rape children or groom, as the Brits say, 12 -17 year olds are both only interested in controlling another person and the young are the easiest control. It isn’t a natural of healthy interest, but an indication of a severe defect of character.

Youtube should be taking down snuff films if there aren’t already making an effort to do so and banning the people who post them. There are plenty of places on the Internet where that material can be obtained and it shouldn’t be on one of the most popular sites in the world.

Governments should not get involved though as the freedom and lack of regulation of the Internet is its strongest feature. This is sadly not the case with your government though as shown by the recent bill banning financial companies processing payments to offshore gambling books,

Youtube does not promote or encourage paedophilia in any way. They do not allow people under 13 to register and so it is very unlikely that there would be anybody under this age featuring in sexually proactive videos. If there were I would assume they would remove the offending content, which seems reasonable considering the video and user you linked to are now down.

As for videos featuring 13 to 17 year olds you are on very shaky grounds if you consider this paedophilia. The medical term for attraction to pubescent teens is ephebophilia and only in cases where the person’s main attraction is teens. This is not classed as a paraphilia and is not listed as a mental illness on the DSM. It is also believed to be quite common in the population due to many studies carried out. Paedophilia is classed as attraction to pre pubescent persons and as such it can not be stated on medical grounds that youtube contains content that would attract paedophiles.

It is also highly controversial to make the argument on legal grounds. Youtube is viewed in a huge number of countries throughout the world and all of these countries have different attitudes and legal systems. For instance in most of the US the age of consent is 18 but in the UK it is 16. Surely this should mean that US citizens should view a huge number of British residents as disgusting paedophiles! British citizens surely shudder in disgust at South Korean women who engage in intercourse with 13 olds, as they are legally entitled to do so. This clearly shows how non-valid it is to argue on legal grounds about youtubes content. This fact is backed up when you consider how backward and hypocritical much of the criminal law is in western countries, which is nicely illustrated by drug prohibition laws.

It is clearly shown from the above that youtube does not contain paedophilic content as the only reliable method to judge this is on the medical definition of paedophilia, which the site does not tolerate. It does contain some content that would be attractive to people primarily interested in adolescents but as stated above this can’t be considered paedophilia on either legal or medical grounds.

If you would like to discuss this matter further I would be happy to especially as this the longest and most thought out piece of writing I have produced since I left university.

I don’t think you know what projection or degeneracy is. Projection is you, a pervert, telling me to “get help”, while degeneracy is your inability to see anything wrong with exploiting young girls and showing peoples deaths for entertainment.