Supposed Libertarian Ron Paul won’t go on the Glenn Beck show even though Beck is quite kind to Paul. Hmmm. Is it because he’s afraid Beck will challenge him on his quackery and unseemly contributors, or because he thinks Beck’s part of the Illuminati?
[youtube]rNEgkAshNnI[/youtube]
So when will Paul agree to an interview? Starts with an “N” and rhymes with “ever.”
What gives you the impression that he is ducking Mr. Beck? Dr. Paul is one of the most demanded people in America right now. Beck extended the invitation only days ago and isn’t really important enough to warrant an immediate response.
The movie above explains that Paul backed out of an appearence and won’t return his calls. Beck is the third most listened to radio host and one of CNN’s better rated shows. Paul will go on Alex Jones but not a show like Becks?
C’mon.
Pingback: 2008 Presidential Election » Why’s Ron Paul Ducking Glen Beck Anyway?
Actually, I hope Ron Paul shines Glenn Beck on. Beck has never been kind to Ron Paul, so why should Ron give Glenn Beck the time of day? His campaign is doing *just fine* without appearing on Beck’s program. Anyway, Beck would be doing Paul no favors because we all know it would be *ambush* time. If anything, Ron Paul appearing on that show would be giving Favor to Glenn Beck, because we all know that Ron Paul draws a HUGE audience online, in person or on air.
No: FORGET Glenn Beck.
What could Beck ambush the “world’s greatest patriot” with?
Listen, Dr. Paul can handle a light weight like Glenn Beck in policy and intellect. The problem is that Beck has the upper hand here. He could go on and on how Dr. Paul won’t come on his show and all the time the Paul campaign is saying they are tyring to contact them and won’t return their call. He is tyring to embarrass Paul by saying he won’t come on. Why would Paul refuse two full hrs, one on radio and one on TV? Why do you think Beck would stop at calling his supporter terrorist? This is his lame way of trying to defuse the trouble he is in with his sponsors that are being boy cotted without actully having Dr. Paul on. Don’t fall for it Beck is lying.This would give Paul millions of dollars of exposer. He would blow Beck away with any ? he had for him. My God they wouldn’t even ask him a policy ? in the debates for fear that the american people would here some truth.
Sure sure. I also hear Ron paul’s so fast he can turn off hs bedroom lights and be in bed before it’s dark.
Aren’t you supposed Libertarians embarressed to have a Communist style cult of personality arund your “dear Leader?”
Glenn beck is a “reformed” cocaine fiend who has found cult religion in Mormonism. Thats right, he’s a magic underpants wearing masonic devil worshipper. The cults always scoop up these losers and fill their heads full of crap like Elohim, the Star Kolob, space aliens, Mormon jesus and god children.
Ron Paul on the other hand is a USAF vet, a long time congressman from Texas, has been married for decades to the same woman, has kids, and has never voted for a tax increase in his entire congressional career.
Which guy is the better representative of conservativism?
Well, actually Libertarianism and Conservatism are different Steve. That’s why people who lean toward social Libertarianism like myself (and Ron Paul no doubt) don’t care much for Becks former drug use or religious predilictions. “Conservatives” or the Pat Buchanan stripe do care, but that’s because the supposed conservatism they espouse is little more than Christianized communism where the state becomes the enforcer of personal morality.
Speaking of cults and losers, only conspiracy theorist believe Mormons are “devil worshiping mason”, an idea first put forward in the 90s during the satanic panic. I studied these folks while getting my Masters and let’s just say I’d rather a mormon live next to me than you.
Since your so in to freedom like all Paul supporters, what’s with the idea that Beck’s religion (if you didn’t make it up) should be used to judge him? For that matter if Beck got of coke shouldn’t we applaud him?
None of what your saying holds water, except to prove that Paul’s supporters aren’t libertarians at all, just a collection of fascists, kooks and Nazis who are unwilling to discuss issues and only able to insult others they don’t agree with.