Monthly Archives: June 2007

Rushdie’s Knighthood: The Jihadist Perspective

Posted on by

From terror supporting website The Ignored Pieces of the puzzle:

We say to all the Muslims, especially those living in Britain: Openly show and proclaim your allegiance to Allah, His Messenger, and the Mujaahideen and openly show and proclaim your disavowal with the Government, its leaders, and the disbelievers. Why? So that you don’t fall into their trap again of being humiliated.

How would that solve the problem?

Once it is clear to them and the society where your allegiance and disavowal belongs to, then no matter what act they do for the purpose of implying that, “Islam is not against this,” they will fail miserably since the people would know very well that the Muslims are against it. Showing open allegiance to the Mujaahideen may be tough, but it will no longer deceive the public (and the ignorant Muslims) on what Islam truly supports. On a side note, do not portray your movement, organization or Masjid as a supporter of such and such (i.e., related to Jihad), rather portray yourselves as Muslims who believe in Allah that are commanded in the Qur’an and the Sunnah to support the Jihad. Why? Because often we see people like Hamza Useless and other so-called moderates “debunk” the Jihadi support as something that has no textual validity or “support from Islam.” In other words, you have to make it clear to the society that Islam created the concept of the Mujaahideen and it obviously supports it.

There’s a lot more to just showing open hatred and enmity to Salman Rushdie; he’s not the only object that we are supposed to be showing open disavowal for. This same hatred and enmity is also supposed to be against the Governments, their policies, their laws, the Mushrikeen and their Shirk, and Kufr. All of this must be proclaimed as something that Islam is against (and not simply your movement). Keep in mind, all of this shouldn’t be done to gain the sympathy of the majority or silent majority or anyone as a matter of fact. Rather, this should only be done because it is the Millah that has been prescribed to us by Allah; and what we have just explained to you is the Millah of Ibraaheem (’alayhis salaam).

Once the Government realizes what you are doing, then it will be the time where your individual faith (as a Muslim) will be tested severely as it will determine whether you are with the Kaafir Government or with the Mujaahideen; if that time doesn’t come today, then it will come tomorrow if Allah wills. If you pledge to be with the believers, then prepare for jail.

Now we can finally ask the question: Are you ready to be jailed for what you believe in?

Preparation starts now, and not tomorrow when it happens.

You think that’s bad take a look around his site, it gets worse. His connection to the insurgency, nominal that it may be, is obvious and his site is clearly a propaganda outlet. But don’t worry, I’ve already dropped dime on them to the FBI. Try it yourself, it’s fun!

Ted Nugent on Leftists

Posted on by

The Nuge read my mind and wrote this op-ed piece about the creeping authoritarianism of the left:

As for the American left: One hears the words of Mao Tse-Tung come broiling out of the mouths of its heroes, when Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton et al unflinchingly push for “redistribution of wealth.”

Central Texas’ own Chet Edwards has the audacity to support taxing the after-tax life savings of American families following the death of a loved one.

The unfair, un-American, unconstitutional death tax literally destroys mom-and-pop businesses across the land. Think about it.

The wall that once symbolized communism is down, yet some still want to give it a shot. Dear God in heaven, help us.

Recently, Danny Glover, an otherwise fine actor, embarrassingly abused his uniquely American freedoms by siding with the communist Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez to finance what clearly appears to be an anti-American propaganda film. Nice.

Meanwhile, right there in that communist country, old Hugo is shutting down an entire media network for daring to challenge his heavy handed, corrupt, dictatorial policies.

This is a leader who has proudly sided with terrorist support groups, and Danny Glover gives him a big hug.

If a Venezuelan citizen were to do so with President Bush, I am confident that Chavez would not respect that individual’s right to free expression.

Venezuela gives its citizens no right to free expression. Glover must be blinded by the trees in that forest.

Examine the agendas of the liberal “party of peace.” Its members clearly don’t believe you and I are smart enough or capable of making our own choices in life.

While conservatives “live and let live,” the left arrogantly thinks it knows better than we do and will burden “we the people” with more government control until we are taxed to death.

Read the whole thing and prepare to raise your devil horns in solidarity.

Muslims Protest Their “Hurt Feelings” with Calls for Murder and Mayhem

Posted on by

As usual the Muslim world exploded after Friday prayers as Muslims filled with the peaceful knowledge of Allah took to the streets for the strangely effeminate orgies of violence and angst that characterize the culture of any country where fundamentalist Islam holds sway.

These protests are supposedly aimed at voicing the outrage of Muslims over Salman Rushdie receiving a Knighthood, a crime which has exposed yet again oversensitivity of Muslims when it comes to being questioned on on their faith. Of course the fact that they’ve responded by honoring Osama Bin laden is glossed over, they themselves claiming it is a equivalent response. It is this and only this which Americans need dwell on, because it exposes the truth about the Islamic world in a way that cannot be covered up by a complicit media.

No state that refers to itself as “Islamic” can ever be trusted as an ally to a western republic. This isn’t the case just because there are large swaths of Muslims who equate Salman Rushdie’s early works with mass murder, because I frankly doubt that they do for the most part. What the “sudden” affection for Bin Laden shows us is that secretly these people, some of them members and supporters of governments we blindly call allies, have always honored Bin Laden. That it is fear of Bush and a lust for our foreign aid that bonds Pakistan and other Muslim countries to us should have been obvious, but most Americans didn’t want to face that truth because of the dire implications for us. The Muslim world wants America conquered and destroyed.

Bin Laden is most famous for his “war” against the U.S. Why then is he being invoked in a disagreement between Pakistan (and the Islamic world) and Britain? Why not some Islamist from England? Because Rushdie’s Knighthood is just a pretext for Islamists to voice their real opinions. When they honor Bin Laden it isn’t in protest of Salman Rushdie, it is in celebration of the 3000 people who died on 9-11. When they call for Rushdie’s death it isn’t to right some perceived wrong, it’s to extend Islamic hegemony over the world.

Islam today is like Christianity in the middle ages, its followers are completely dedicated to spreading a theocracy around the world. Christianity’s brutality, which was extreme, was nonetheless tempered by its own theology, a reformation and a slow push toward modernity. Islam has none of those things. The only barrier to the installation of a genocidal, racist worldwide kingdom of Muslim slave owners is the resistance of the rest of the non-Muslim world, which is unfortunately next to nonexistent.

After Rushdie it’ll be the Lord of the Rings (remember the wicked men of the east who helped Sauron?) that inflames the Islamic world, then maybe Alice Cooper and eventually national sovereignty. They will riot and burn and pillage their way into dominance over us unless we stand united in defense of western tradition, freedom, liberty and today Salman Rushdie.

Clinton, Boxer Display their Chavismo

Posted on by

Senators Boxer and Clinton are the latest leftists emboldened by Chavez’s Soviet-like dealings with RCTV and eager to try their hand at censoring free speech in America. Breit Bart has audio of a witness to the planned airwave revolution here which should send chills up the spine of all but the most hardcore socialists.

Hot Air had the audio which was taken down, but does have a good analysis of one of the unintended consequences of a revived “Fairness Doctrine” in radio – the death of traditional radio as satellite radio explodes.

Michelle Malkin exposes the proponents of the “Fairness Doctrine,” and it isn’t pretty.

As Gateway Pundit says, Hugo Chavez Would Be Proud!