Category Archives: Counter Jihad

Intifada Tee-Shirts sold at Arab Festival in Prospect Park

Posted on by

The group selling them are linked to the principal of the proposed Khalil Gibran Arab language academy. From Stop the Madrasa:

So here are the dots, connected. On Dhabah Almontaser’s watch, the Yemeni American Association’s Awaam organization created and is still selling t-shirts for young girls that say “Intifada NYC,” in the city that suffered the 9-11 attacks from Islamist terrorists. It makes sense, because she opposes the war on terror – these t-shirts make that all too plain, as did her interview with Amnesty International in January 2002:

“But I have experienced that when you talk to people and explain what is going on, then they are as strongly against the ‘war against terror’ as I. That gives me hope for the future. “

And we may assume that these t-shirts also give Almontaser hope that the war on terror will be blocked, so she can see a future of “Intifada NYC.”

This is the woman Mayor Bloomberg, Chancellor Klein and Garth Harries consider a model principal, for others to emulate. These are the views they espouse as multicultural enrichment of the curricula.

“Intifada NYC” – not just a slogan, an educational initiative from the Department of Education.

If she approved these t-shirts, she is not just an Islamist in her views, she is advocating an Intifada in New York City. Your choice what that actually means. She should be fired, and Chancellor Klein should shut down the KGIA project.

If these t-shirts were designed, approved, manufactured, received, stored, brought to the Arab Fair and sold by an organization associated with the Yemeni American Association, and she knew nothing of the matter (or did not disavow it if she did), then she is negligent in the extreme and should be fired, and Chancellor Klein should shut down the KGIA project.

Scary stuff, Pamela Hall has been leading the charge on this for months in NYC, and she’ll be on the Glen Beck show tonight to discuss this and the counter jihad in New York. 7:00 and 9:00 on Headline News and CNN. Check it out.

Sudan Attempted to Enlist Al-Qaeda to Fight Racist Jihad

Posted on by

From the Sudan Tribune:

The Sudanese government decided to lift restrictions on Al-Qaeda members in the country in return for their help in fighting peacekeepers in Darfur.

The classified document sent to Sudan Tribune by a group named Kosh Liberation Movement (KLM) was dated April 27, 2004 and signed by senior members of Sudan’s presidency, ruling National Congress Party (NCP) and the army.

One of the signatories was Sudan’s presidential adviser Majzoub al-Khalifa who was killed in a car accident last month signing on behalf of the NCP.

The authenticity of the document could not be independently verified.

Osama bin Laden lived in Sudan for several years in the early 1990s.

The document requests all government agencies to allow “foreign Jihadis who came to Sudan with Osama Bin Laden in 1994 to resume their political activities in Sudan given the circumstances surrounding foreign intervention in Darfur to support armed forces and the people of Sudan to fight Zionist enemies”.

The decision outlines certain steps to be taken to allow Al-Qaeda to operate in Sudan such as unfreezing their bank accounts and returning all properties confiscated in 1996.

A copy of the order was sent to President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir, Head of Security Services and a representative of Al-Qaeda in Sudan.

Last year Al-Qaeda’s second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahri called on Muslims in a video released on Friday to launch a holy war against proposed U.N. peacekeepers in Sudan’s Darfur region.

The racist violence of Muslim Jihadist knows no bounds, whether it be in Africa or here on our own streets as with the Abdel Hamze case which exposed the racist anti-black sentiments of the Muslim community in America. When will America wake up to the vile poison of the Jihadist theology, which turns people into savage bloodthirsty murderers who cannot be appeased or reasoned with, but must be destroyed before they infect others with their evil?

h/t Jihad Watch

Hitchens on the High Cost of Liberal Tolerance

Posted on by

It is paid with the blood of women, he argues:

Only at the tail end of the coverage was it admitted that a car bomb might have been parked outside a club in Piccadilly because it was “ladies night” and that this explosion might have been designed to lure people into to the street, the better to be burned and shredded by the succeeding explosion from the second car-borne cargo of gasoline and nails. Since we have known since 2004 that a near-identical attack on a club called the Ministry of Sound was proposed in just these terms, on the grounds that dead “slags” or “sluts” would be regretted by nobody, a certain amount of trouble might have been saved by assuming the obvious. The murderers did not just want body parts in general but female body parts in particular.

I suppose that some people might want to shy away from this conclusion for whatever reason, but they cannot have been among the viewers of British Channel 4’s recent Undercover Mosque, or among those who watched Sunday’s report from Christiane Amanpour on CNN’s Special Investigations Unit. On these shows, the British Muslim fanatics came right out with their program. Straight into the camera, leading figures like Anjem Choudary spoke of their love for Osama Bin Laden and their explicit rejection of any definition of Islam as a religion of peace. On tape or in person, mullahs in prominent British mosques called for the killing of Indians and Jews.

Liberal reluctance to confront this sheer horror is the result, I think, of a deep reticence about some furtive concept of “race.” It is subconsciously assumed that a critique of political Islam is an attack on people with brown skins. One notes in passing that any such concession implicitly denies or negates Islam’s claim to be a universal religion. Indeed, some of its own exponents certainly do speak as if they think of it as a tribal property. And, at any rate, in practice, so it is. The fascistic subculture that has taken root in Britain and that lives by violence and hatred is composed of two main elements. One is a refugee phenomenon, made up of shady exiles from the Middle East and Asia who are exploiting London’s traditional hospitality, and one is the projection of an immigrant group that has its origins in a particularly backward and reactionary part of Pakistan.

AllahPundit isn’t quite convinced, but I sat in a graduate level class on Spanish theater last night and heard an Episcopalian Priest tell the professor during a break that Islam is actually matriarchal, women had tons of power in Islam and “we” just didn’t get the “right” information about it. If Hitchens deals with the same sort of liberal crackpottery day in and day out, it’s easy to see how his thesis took root, and in my experience easier still to support it.

Gang Rape Jihad Ignored by Media!

Posted on by

Women in European countries are suffering frequent gang rapes by unassimilated, radicalized Muslim youths and the authorities have taken the side of the rapists time and again. From The Brussels Journal:

In March this year, native Dutch residents of the city of Utrecht rioted to protest against harassment by Muslim youths and government inaction to stop this. The authorities immediately suppressed the riots by sealing off the area and installing surveillance cameras to control Dutch non-Muslims, but they have done virtually nothing to address the underlying problem of Muslim violence. And this is far from unique to the Netherlands.

Sweden experienced a quadrupling in the number of rape charges in the space of a single generation. Yet Sweden’s largest newspaper Aftonbladet recently indicated that the spike in rape numbers was due to the “warm weather,” which would presumably mean that these rapes are caused by global warming. The fact that many of the suspects have a Muslim background is purely coincidental, no doubt.

The Dutch Crown Prince Willem-Alexander is worried about the “sharp tone” of the debate surrounding Muslim immigration, and reminds his countrymen that “speech is silver, silence is golden.” Apparently, the rest of the Dutch political class shares this view, relieved that Pim Fortuyn was silenced and Ayaan Hirsi Ali was driven out of the country.

Fjorman, the author goes on to quote from a translated Dutch press piece that is both shocking and maddening:

Dozens of boys and girls have been systematically abused, intimidated and molested by a group of older boys in the Utrecht neighborhood of Overvecht for almost a year, the Telegraaf reports.

Municipal council member Bouchra Dibi (Labour PvdA) investigated the incidents taking place at the playground near the Neckardreef in Overvecht.

Children aged 8, 9 and 10 were dragged into the bushes and coerced into performing sexual acts on boys a few years older. Most of the children involved are of Moroccan background, the newspaper reports.

The municipal council member told the Telegraaf that the problems are not being addressed. “This has been going on for almost a year. People just talk and talk and talk. And nothing is done,” she said.

Social workers, police and the municipality do not know how to approach the parents, Dibi says. “These sorts of things are taboo to talk about in the Moroccan community.”

Utrecht Mayor Annie Brouwer-Korf (PvdA) acknowledges that there have been problems among children since the end of last year. “Intimidation, threats and fights, and, since the beginning of this year we have seen signals of sexual abuse. A report of sexual molestation by children has been passed on to the public prosecution department,” the mayor says.

Brouwer says it is difficult to get an idea of how widespread the abuses are because there is no concrete information on suspects, victims and locations.

Council member Dibi says this is mainly due to parents’ hesitance to report incidents. “Parents do not dare say anything because they are afraid of the perpetrators. There is a great deal of fear. That is why they don’t always report these things.”

The problem of sexual violence in Islamic communities is wide spread among radicalized men who see the aggressive acts of degradation as part of the Jihad to spread Islam. Dhimmi Watch brings us a report out of Pakistan of a group of Muslim men gang raping a male Christian associate when he refused to convert to Islam. The rape Jihad in Sweden was being reported for years but the media has continued to ignore the problem.

Instead they blame the rape waves on the summer! Implying that these thugs and deviants are driven crazy by hormones when the weather gets warm and women wear less. In other words it’s the victims fault. And again I ask, where are the feminists? Where is the outrage?

They’ve got better fish to fry.

Rushdie’s Knighthood: The Jihadist Perspective

Posted on by

From terror supporting website The Ignored Pieces of the puzzle:

We say to all the Muslims, especially those living in Britain: Openly show and proclaim your allegiance to Allah, His Messenger, and the Mujaahideen and openly show and proclaim your disavowal with the Government, its leaders, and the disbelievers. Why? So that you don’t fall into their trap again of being humiliated.

How would that solve the problem?

Once it is clear to them and the society where your allegiance and disavowal belongs to, then no matter what act they do for the purpose of implying that, “Islam is not against this,” they will fail miserably since the people would know very well that the Muslims are against it. Showing open allegiance to the Mujaahideen may be tough, but it will no longer deceive the public (and the ignorant Muslims) on what Islam truly supports. On a side note, do not portray your movement, organization or Masjid as a supporter of such and such (i.e., related to Jihad), rather portray yourselves as Muslims who believe in Allah that are commanded in the Qur’an and the Sunnah to support the Jihad. Why? Because often we see people like Hamza Useless and other so-called moderates “debunk” the Jihadi support as something that has no textual validity or “support from Islam.” In other words, you have to make it clear to the society that Islam created the concept of the Mujaahideen and it obviously supports it.

There’s a lot more to just showing open hatred and enmity to Salman Rushdie; he’s not the only object that we are supposed to be showing open disavowal for. This same hatred and enmity is also supposed to be against the Governments, their policies, their laws, the Mushrikeen and their Shirk, and Kufr. All of this must be proclaimed as something that Islam is against (and not simply your movement). Keep in mind, all of this shouldn’t be done to gain the sympathy of the majority or silent majority or anyone as a matter of fact. Rather, this should only be done because it is the Millah that has been prescribed to us by Allah; and what we have just explained to you is the Millah of Ibraaheem (’alayhis salaam).

Once the Government realizes what you are doing, then it will be the time where your individual faith (as a Muslim) will be tested severely as it will determine whether you are with the Kaafir Government or with the Mujaahideen; if that time doesn’t come today, then it will come tomorrow if Allah wills. If you pledge to be with the believers, then prepare for jail.

Now we can finally ask the question: Are you ready to be jailed for what you believe in?

Preparation starts now, and not tomorrow when it happens.

You think that’s bad take a look around his site, it gets worse. His connection to the insurgency, nominal that it may be, is obvious and his site is clearly a propaganda outlet. But don’t worry, I’ve already dropped dime on them to the FBI. Try it yourself, it’s fun!