Murder Attempt on Anti-Jihad Activists Unreported by Media

sioe-ambushed-in-denmark.jpg

Stop the Islamization Of Europe held a rally for Islamofascism Awareness Week which ended up proving to the world that Islamic Imperialists and their Marxist allies have a violent agenda of extermination planned for all their political opponents. From SIOE’s website:

On Sunday the 21th October SIOE Denmark had announced a demonstration in Copenhagen. Read previous post. Before the demo Anders Gravers (SIOE and SIAD) and 2 other members were driving in a van with three seats in the front, following the security car, where an elderly woman, 74 years, (foto) and member of SIAD and another SIAD member were passengers.

Anders was driving and followed the security car down in a parking cellar to park so the cars would be in a secure place before the demo.
He drove very slowly down because apparently there was very little space in the hight for the van. The driveway is very steep and is divided by concrete pillars. Because of the delaying, the driver of the security car got out of his car to open the metalgate again because it was closing after 30 sek. so we could enter the cellar. He directed the van forwards close along the pillars and directly in front of a big concrete pillar supporting the cellar roof.

2-5 sek. after there was a loud bang and the frontwindow was damaged. About two autonomous looking types were in the front and two on each sites smashing the site windows shouting Get him out get him out! and started hitting Anders and the SIAD passenger in the other site with ironbars. The SIAD member in the middle (foto) was hit of a thrown filled soda bottle in her backhead.

Anders succeeded after a while to kick one of the autonomous hard in the face as he leaned in to unlock the door. Anders managed to get out with a fire extinguisher from the van and hit another one hard on the shoulder. It remained later that they attempted to stab him down when there was found cut holes in the shirt, jacket and vest. Anders was wearing his security vest which saved his life.

Suddenly they disappeared and Anders got around the van and saw a SIAD member (foto top) lying on the floor while he was beaten in the head of 4-5 persons with ironbars. Apparently they also tried to stab him down, but again he also wore his security vest which saved his life.

Suddenly someone screamed RUN RUN and they disappeared up the steep driveway. The elderly woman was lying on the floor completely still. She had been in the security car and got out immediately when the driver shouted OUT OUT. She didn’t’t know what to do and started running. She was hunted down by two persons and banged down with an ironbar. She lay completely still in the hope she wouldn’t get anymore. She felt they stood a moment watching her if she would move. Then they presumably ran to the other SIAD member on the floor and joined the attack on him.

English is the second language of many of the SIOE crew so I left the above unedited. This horrific attack was perpetrated in the name of Islam, but it unlikely that Muslims were the only criminals involved. I’ve blogged before about left wing direct action group “Anti-Fascist Action” which has been acting as government sanctioned shock troops to suppress counter jihad activism. They’ve even managed to get Wikipedia editors to white wash the organization in this entry which claims the group only attacks “fascists” ignoring their attempted abduction of a 19 year old girl for the gods knows what purpose.

Sweden’s AFA openly brags about beating several “homophobes” on their site, one so severely that he or she went to the hospital and have stalked a Swedish judge going so far as to vandalize his house. My guess is that AFA in Denmark, or a group very much like them, are involved.

Gates of Vienna has more on the loathsome AFA here and how the media covers for their crimes. Daily Pundit has a post which puts AFA in perspective here.

Here’s a clip of AFA among others fighting “fascists” in Berlin:

[youtube]k_ZNE6E3jJU[/youtube]

You’ll of course notice that all the “fascists” here are riot police simply trying to keep the peace. This next one’s worse:

[youtube]RZWO1xZMN4U[/youtube]

Trust me if someone’s arrested for this horrendous attack, they’ll be AFA or affiliated with some similar group of anti-social White welfare staters. Not that you’ll hear about it anyway, the attempted mass murder of four political activists by a groups of assailants doesn’t rate MSM coverage these days.

h/t Jihad Watch

Update: Gateway Pundit is reporting that, as I predicted, the thugs were “anti-fascist” anarchists who have seemingly confessed on one of their websites. AFA related or just imitators, as the news of their brazen attack going unpunished, and in fact unmentioned in most of the MSM, expect ideologically affiliated groups in the U.S. to follow suit.

The Death of the Grown Up: A Little Something for the Ladies

dirty-old-man-tried-sex-19-yr-old.jpg

Diana West’s The Death of the Grown Up: How America’s Arrested Development is Bringing Down Western Civilization is pure genius, not just because it’s a devastating critique of devolving modern culture but because it basically promotes itself.

The news is replete with examples of childish behavior encouraged by societies that re-enforce stunted emotional growth. Like this one from the Spiegel in which a 77 year old man is suing a 19 year old girl he wined and dined because she wouldn’t have sex with him:

It’s no secret that Germany has a problem with ageism. Workers here who lose their jobs after the age of 50 are virtually assured of spending the rest of their lives on the dole. A recent plan to up the retirement age to 67 was lampooned because most Germans of that age are no longer employed anyway.

But aging German playboy Rolf Eden seems to have developed a somewhat warped view of what age discrimination actually is. According to Bild Zeitung on Thursday, the 77-year-old Eden has filed suit against a 19-year-old Berlin woman for the following reason: Despite a night on the town with Eden, which ended back at his place, she refused to have sex with him, saying the he was too old for her.

“That was shattering. No woman has ever said that to me before,” Eden told the tabloid. “I was crushed.” He has filed charges with the prosecutors’ office, he said. “After all, there are laws against discrimination.”

A woman not wanting to allow a man old enough to be her great grandfather to mount her and maybe die atop her is, in his mind, discrimination? Is he saying that it’s his right to have sex with 19 year old women?

But more importantly, why is Germany allowing this frivolous lawsuit which in essence is a man not suing “for sex” as the Spiegel titles it, but suing for the right to demand sex from women he’s kind to. In America there’s a word for this: Rape.

I’m 36 and if I wasn’t a happily married man my personal cut of for sex partners would be 25 or so. A ten year difference is about all a real relationship can maintain. I’ve worked with teens and can tell you people younger than 25 more often view me as the kindly uncle or perhaps a mentor/father figure.

Which is how it should be and at my age I’m happy to be that to someone. As an adult, I don’t stalk teens and young adults for sex, but hope that I can be a good influence and positive presence on the few I come into contact with.

Rolf Eden sees 19 year old girls as part of some sort of government mandated entitlement to dirty old men. Rolf took a girl to dinner who was probably either doing what she thought was a good deed, or looking for a grandfatherly figure in her life, but he was blinded by his own childish fantasy of being an eternal ladies man to see that this girl just wanted a little good conversation and to hear some stories of how he survived the Nazi regime.

He refuses to grow up and accept a non-sexual role in the lives of young women, and he’ll tie up the German court system to keep living out his fantasy. Or as a way to get attention. Either way, it’s extremely childish.

h/t Bookworm Room

Members of Gang That Stoned Old Man to Death in England Get “Tough” Two Year Sentence

Five members of a gang of twenty or so youths who set upon a 67 year old man bowling in park with his 17 year old son and stoned the older man to death in an unprovoked and extraordinarily vicious attack were sentenced to two years in England’s version of Juvenile detention. From the BBC:

five boys have been sentenced to two years’ detention for killing a father who collapsed with a heart attack after being pelted with stones and rocks.

Ernest Norton, 67, was playing cricket with his son at a leisure centre in Erith, south-east London, when he was targeted in February 2006.

The pair came under a hail of missiles and two stones hit Mr Norton’s head.

The boys, now aged between 12 and 14, were convicted of manslaughter and violent disorder in August.

Passing the sentence at the Old Bailey, Judge Warwick McKinnon said: “The conduct of all of you as a group was utterly disgraceful and criminally irresponsible.”

Yes the judges outrage was clear when he sentenced these future murders to such an imposing sentence. Hopefully with tongue firmly planted in cheek one of the officers involved n the case blurted out this seemingly satirical statement:

Following the sentence, Det Insp Clive Hayes said he hoped the “tough sentence” will “act as a deterrent” to other youths tempted to get involved in anti-social behavior.

He added that Mr Norton’s family was “satisfied” and felt “justice has been done”.

I’ll suspect something has been lost in the translation between family of dead victim and the authorities who imposed what is in essence a slap on the wrist to these burgeoning Mansons.

The question is this: What kind of people raised these kids to think stoning people to death seems acceptable weekend activity?

h/t Theo Spark

England: Gay Slurs Worse Than Rape

A new law over the pond makes bad mouthing (no pun intended) homosexuals a crime punishable by seven years in prison. I assume this means almost every lesbian in England will end up in the joint once they hear what our sapphic sisters think of their male counter parts.

More importantly, the new law gives people more time than rapists who average a disgustingly low sentence of five years.

From the Daily Mail:

Stirring up hatred against homosexuals is to become a serious crime punishable with a seven-year jail sentence under a law announced last night.

The legislation – similar to laws already in force outlawing persecution on religious or racial grounds – will make criminals of those who express their views in ways that could lead to the bullying or harassment of gays.

The maximum sentence is longer than the average of around five years handed to rapists.

The announcement widened the rift between opposing supporters of freedom of speech and gay rights.

Christian groups condemned it as “a law to allow Christians to be locked up for what they believe”.

But the gay pressure group Stonewall said those who disapprove of homosexuals would have nothing to fear from the law if they express their views in a manner that is “temperate” and “polite”.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw told MPs the gay harassment law will be included as an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill currently going before Parliament, though ministers have yet to decide the wording.

Mr Straw said: “It is a measure of how far we have come as a society in the last ten years that we are now appalled by hatred and invective directed at people on the basis of their sexuality.

“It is time for the law to recognize this.”

He raised the prospect of extending the law to cover to “transgendered” people and the disabled.

The new law aims to catch those who do not explicitly call for attacks or discrimination against homosexuals, as this is covered by existing incitement laws.

Instead, police will be allowed to pursue those who create an “atmosphere or climate” in which hatred or bullying can be fostered.

So a rapist is, according to the sentencing guidelines, less vile than some closet case who yelps out a condemnation of gays, or a Christian who is for all intents and purposes following the tenants of his religion by saying homosexual relationships (and in fact all intimate relationships outside of a Marriage) are wrong?

Isn’t this misogyny? Doesn’t this law in essence say that it’s worse to offend a man than it is to violate a woman?

h/t Theo Spark

Priceless Monet Vandalized During French “Sleepless Night” Festival

The French Nuit Blanche festival is an all night post modernist happening that’s become a popular annual event for many revelers for whom a night of drunken debauchery among the dull, lifeless imaginings that passes for art is considered culture. Pretentious in that unsophisticated you find mostly on college campuses, it seems more a last grasp at potency from a flaccid culture deveined by Marxism than celebration of modern civilization.

Or as Tiberge of GalliaWatch so artfully puts it:

Virtual reality, gigantic parabolas, music from outer space, a mixture of real and digital images – everything to please the contemporary mentality. Since I wasn’t there, I should not talk about it, but I have the distinct feeling that this sort of thing is not for me. It sounds mindless, gimmicky and purely technical, although some of the visual aspects were undoubtedly “interesting”, in the way fireworks are interesting – a temporary charge and then silence.

Ultimately, the display of purely technical prowess becomes a unique form of violence, devoid as it is of a human message, of an interpretation of life, which is one of the purposes of art. This technical virtuosity has a deadening effect on the spirit, and perhaps that is what it is supposed to do. It’s the “circus” part of the “bread and circus” promise made by pagan governments to the people.

However, I may be too harsh, not having been there.

It should be no surprise to anyone to hear that in such an environment a group of drunken barbarians broke into a Museum and attacked the life affirming true art that is the antithesis of Nuit Blanche, and indeed modern art everywhere. From the AP:

Intruders entered the Orsay Museum early Sunday and punched a hole in a renowned work by Impressionist painter Claude Monet, “Le Pont d’Argenteuil,” the French Culture Minister said.

A surveillance camera caught a group entering the museum, located on the Left Bank of the French capital along the Seine River and housing a major collection of Impressionist artists like Monet.

An alarm sounded and the group left, but not before damaging the painting, an aide to Culture Minister Christine Albanel said by telephone.

No arrests were immediately made.

Albanel told France-Info radio that the painting could be restored, but she deplored what she said was an attack on “our memory, our heritage.”

“This splendid Monet painting (was) punched right in the middle,” the minister said with emotion.

According to the aide, a 10-centimetre tear was made in the Monet, perhaps with a fist. The official, not authorized to speak publicly of the matter, asked not to be named.

It was not immediately clear how many people were in the group that broke into the museum.

Monet led the 19th century Impressionist movement, experimenting notably with light and colour in works now deemed priceless.

While I tend to admire more the fashionable despair, as I heard it put, of the literary works of French authors like Baudelaire and Rimbaud, or the perverse wickedness of La Bas (the written word captures more emotion than the canvas ever can, in my opinion) than the admittedly genius compositions of the impressionists, I am saddened by the knowledge that the work of a great artist would be treated so disrespectfully in his own country.

Yet another way in which western civilization is being destroyed by the cancer from within.