Denver McCain Campaign Office Receives Envelope With White Powder and Threat

And so it begins…

John McCain’s Denver campaign office received an envelope containing white powder and a threatening note Thursday afternoon.

Spokesman Jeff Sadosky told FOX News the office has been evacuated and the campaign notified federal and local law enforcement, who are taking all precautions.

The letter was opened at about 5 p.m. ET.

Have there been any other stories coming out of Denver featuring a white powder recently? You bet. But don’t worry, the case of the Somali Muslim found dead with a pound of cyanide was declared not to be terror related.

Maybe some Obama supporters were working for change the old lefty way. You know, the way William Ayers would have done it?

Of course the Recreate ’68 forces are probably already in Denver in full force so let’s not rule out a stunt by some of the young “revolutionaries” who are even now loading their pockets with illicit jars of urine and feces to “Smash Capitalism” with.

Drunkablog has more on the Recreate ’68 participants, lest you think I’m unfairly smearing a peaceful protest. Even the Colorado Green Party tried to get thier spokeswierdo Cynthia McKinney to pull out of her appearance at the event, fearful of the backlash against them when people see exactly what these collection of misfits is all about. Here’s a sample list of some of their speakers taken form one of their own press releases:

Ida Audeh – Palestinian Refugee

Kathleen Cleaver – Black Panthers

Ward Churchill – Long-time Author, Activist, and Scholar

Mark Cohen – Re-create 68 Alliance

Chairman Fred Hampton Jr. – Prisoners of Conscience Committee

Larry Hales – World Worker’s Party and Re-create 68 Alliance

Larry Holmes – Troops Out Now Coalition

Ron Kovic – anti-war activist, veteran and author of Born On The Fourth of July

Cynthia Mckinney – Green Party United States Presidential Candidate

Black Panthers? Palestinians? World Worker’s Party? They would never send threats/hazardous materials to a Republican, right?

A Holmesian mystery indeed.

Denver Cyanide Death Ruled a Suicide

At least according to the Denver authorities Saleman Abdirahman Dirie’s death is a suicide. From the Denver Post:

The Denver coroner’s office announced Wednesday it has determined that a Canadian man found dead Aug. 11 at the Burnsley Hotel in the Capitol Hill neighborhood committed suicide by ingesting cyanide.

Saleman Abdirahman Dirie, 29, of Ottawa, Canada, had been dead some time when his body was discovered near a pound of sodium cyanide.

The coroner had previously confirmed that test results found cyanide in Dirie’s body.

Police have said Dirie’s death was an isolated incident and unconnected with next week’s Democratic National Convention.

Family members in Canada have said that Dirie left Ottawa on Aug. 7, traveling to Montreal in a rental car.

There, it appears he took a bus to Denver, where he told his family he was taking a vacation.

Yeah, that makes sense. A Somali Muslim who recently immigrated to Canada and had no visible means of support jumps the border illegally to “vacation” at a $200 a night hotel in the city about to host the Democratic convention. There he is found dead with a pound of cyanide which is enough to kill hundreds of people.

His ingestion is ruled a suicide as opposed to mishandling. Because it’s clear that the extra cyanide was just in case. This isn’t terrorism at all.

Russia Cuts Off Access to Major Georgian Port

The Russian sack of Georgia continues as the world stands by helpless:

POTI, Georgia (AP) – Russian forces blocked the only land entrance to Georgia’s main port city on Thursday, a day before Russia promised to complete a troop pullout from its ex-Soviet neighbor.

Armored personnel carriers and troop trucks blocked the bridge to the Black Sea port city of Poti, and Russian forces excavated trenches and set up mortars facing the city. Another group of APCs and trucks were positioned in a nearby wooded area.

Although Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has promised that his forces would pull back by Friday, Russian troops appear to be digging in, raising concern about whether Moscow is aiming for a lengthy occupation of its small, pro-Western neighbor.

Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili told The Associated Press that Russia was thinning out its presence in some occupied towns but was seizing other strategic spots. He called the Russian moves “some kind of deception game.”

“(The Russians) are making fun of the world,” he declared.

An EU-sponsored cease-fire says both Russian and Georgian forces must move back to positions they held before fighting broke out Aug. 7 in Georgia’s separatist republic of South Ossetia, which has close ties to Russia. The agreement also says Russian forces can work in a so-called “security zone” that extends more than four miles into Georgia from South Ossetia.

Poti is at least 95 miles west of the nearest point in South Ossetia.

This is clearly an attempt to stop humanitarian aid from flowing into the Georgian territory. We’ve bombed warlords in Africa for acting the same way. But as Gabriel Schoenfeld puts forward in this essay America’s good faith efforts to denuclearize our military keeps us from dealing with Russia effectively:

Under the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), which went into force in 1994, both the U.S. and the USSR made radical cuts in their strategic nuclear arsenals — that is, in weapons of intercontinental range. The 2002 Moscow Treaty pushed the numbers down even further, until each side’s strategic nuclear umbrella was pocket-size.

Yet matters are very different at the tactical, or short-range, level. Here, the U.S., acting unilaterally and with virtually no fanfare, sharply cut back its stockpile of nonstrategic nuclear warheads. As far back as 1991, the U.S. began to retire all of its nuclear warheads for short-range ballistic missiles, artillery and antisubmarine warfare. According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, not one of these weapons exists today. The same authoritative publication estimates that the number of tactical warheads in the U.S. arsenal has dwindled from thousands to approximately 500.

Russia has also reduced the size of its tactical nuclear arsenal, but starting from much higher levels and at a slower pace, leaving it with an estimated 5,000 such devices — 10 times the number of tactical weapons held by the U.S. Such a disparity would be one thing if we were contending with a stable, postcommunist regime moving in the direction of democracy and integration with the West. That was the Russia we anticipated when we began our nuclear build-down. But it is not the Russia we are facing today.

Not only has Russia retained a sizable nuclear arsenal, its military and political leaders regularly engage in aggressive bluster about expanded deployment and possible use, and sometimes they go beyond bluster. Six months ago, Russia began sending cruise missile-capable Bear H bombers on sallies along the coast of Alaska.

Ex-K.G.B . leader Putin is using cold war calculus to expose our relative weakness in dealing with his regime, noting that he could send ten nukes into America for every one we send to Russia even if we had the will to do so, which I would argue we don’t. More importantly Russia’s military, though less professional and technically advanced, has proven that the sledge hammer tactics of the Soviet Union is not only still viable, but a perfect counter to America’s “agile” specialized forces. We cannot stop a full on Russian onslaught with the anti-terrorism model of our military and Putin knows it.

The Russian show of force has helped push oil prices back up and is eliminating the recent gains the dollar has made. Putin no doubt knows the tensions he’s causing will hurt our economy and is willing to push this to the limit to squeeze every last drop of blood from America.

Russian Bombers Patrolling Off Alaskan Coastline!

If Pat Buchanan and the rest of the Putinists don’t see this as a provocation, they’re being willfully blind:

Rice said Russia has raised questions about its place in the international community through the invasion and other actions, including the resumption last year for the first time since the 1991 collapse of the former Soviet Union of air patrols near the Alaskan coast by Tu-95 strategic bombers, code-named Bears by NATO.

“We’ve had Russian strategic aviation challenging in ways they haven’t, even along our borders with the United States, which I might note is a very dangerous game and perhaps one that I suggest the Russians want to reconsider. This is not one that is cost-free,” Rice said.

She did not elaborate on a U.S. reaction to the flights, which have been widely seen as an attempt by Russia, flush with windfall oil profits, to reassert itself as a global power despite serious problems with its military.

Since the flights resumed in August 2007, U.S. and Canadian fighters have intercepted the Russian bombers and escorted them away from the U.S. coast.

U.S. officials have previously attached little real significance to the flights by the turboprop-powered Cold War relics, and defense officials said Monday that recent flights did not provoke concerns within the Pentagon.

Yes, why be concerned with turbo prop bombers, it’s not as if a wave of them escorted by Migs could slip one or two nukes by our Coast guard. The flights began last year and were the beginning of a series of escalating provocations by Russia to test American resolve.

Fly overs of The USS Nimitz take on a more sinister meaning in light of Russian aggression. Will the next fly over of one of our ships lead to an attack? Are the Russians making these flights to lull us into complacency? A year ago I’d have said no but watching the Russian sack of Georgia now I’m not so sure.

h/t N.T.A.