I guess that woman who requested a non-muslim cab driver in England doesn’t look so crazy now. From Sara Shepard:
A cabbie who allegedly drove an inebriated passenger to a hotel room and tried to have sex with her while she was unconscious has been sentenced to four years behind bars.
Abdi Qamaan, 48, of Kansas City, was charged with kidnapping and attempted forcible sodomy in connection with the December 2006 incident.
Qamaan told police he took the 28-year-old woman from a Midtown bar to the hotel because she was too drunk to tell him where she needed to go, according to court documents. Police were at the hotel when Qamaan returned the next morning to take her home.
Qamaan denied having sex with the woman, but police found both his and the woman’s DNA on a condom left in the hotel room.
The complaint against Qamaan can be read here. This old article from FrontPage explains why Muslim men may not be the best choice for someone to be alone with a drunk woman, or your teenage daughter. Takeaway quote:
In the case of prevailing orthodox Islam we are faced with a deep division between the sexes. With Allah’s unlimited ruling license the males are entitled to be the masters of the females. The Koranic order says that the man has to “go to the woman” whenever he likes, to “enjoy her however he likes”, and to discipline her in case she develops her own ideas like sexual self-determination.
Over the centuries this basic frame had been filled with a lot of “prophetic” instructions as to what disastrous role the woman could play if the man as Allah’s deputy does not carry out this divine license of fertilizing control. Insofar the woman is looked upon from a “higher” biologistic viewpoint regarding her as “seed field” that – under strict male surveillance signaled by “Islamic correct” veiling – guarantees for the continued survival and expansion of Islam.
We are dealing here with premodern, partly archaic thinking that divides its world into two Manichaean halves. Irrespective of the usual statistical remnant of liberal “dissidents”, the orthodox ideology bases on an Islamic half that accords to Koran and “prophetic” tradition and a non-Islamic half consisting of unbelievers and disobedient women. The religious war – known as “jihad” – against the latter two groups belongs, therefore, to the most prominent duties of the “believing” Muslim. Its “religious” dimension is boosted enormously by customary family “honor” installing male control from early youth on, often widening into brutal raping, sometimes incestuous punishing patterns.
In other words Islam screws men up and makes them more prone to see raping non-Muslim women as a sanctioned activity.
Fjordman’s seminal editorial on Europe’s Muslim rape wave is a must read on this subject. Also by way of Fjordman we find that six times more women were raped in Oslo, Sweden than in NYC in 2006. Two thirds of the assailants were Muslims. Oslo is currently under sige by a combination of Muslim and “anti-fascist” thugs. I’ve no doubt that they are raping any women they come across. Here’s video of the chaos.
In Australia Islamic rape sprees led to so-caled race riots although I’m not sure what race Islam is.
Without strong voices advocating the superiority of Western values how long until we have our own rape waves?
h/t Crime Scene KC
