‘Netroots Show Their True Colors (Klan White)

Though many people disagree with me, I believe ALL White “Liberals” are racists, and that modern liberalism, distinct from what used to be mainstream Democratic thought, is inherently racist. Modern liberalism, which is little more than a secularized cult of radical Christianity, instills in its adherents a belief in the inferiority of non-Whites evidenced by their inability (in “liberals'” eyes) to succeed in our country without the constant guidance and attention Whites. At the same time this attitude creates a racist view of non-Whites who don’t accept liberal dogma as betraying not just liberalism, but their own race. This is due to the belief common among so-called progressives that minorities in America are better off following the orders of White liberals who know what is in the best interest of those groups, and are more qualified than minorities to set an “empowering” agenda for non-Whites.

In this atmosphere, a Black or Filipina woman who is decidedly conservative becomes a target for the latent hostility the White liberal feels toward the groups he or she “just wants to help” but aren’t sufficiently grateful for their efforts. A minority of any political persuasion who openly disagrees with the modern “progressive” is lucky to be only dismissed, but more often than not finds themselves on the receiving end of hateful racism that would seem more at home at a Klan rally than among the enlightened liberal masses.

I realized all this years ago, in high school and later college when time and again supposedly liberal academics and students would tell me things like “If you reform welfare, Blacks will starve!” or that “Women shouldn’t be held to the same standards as men in math, that wouldn’t be fair.” The school I got my undergraduate degree from wanted to increase Black enrollment in the ’90’s, so right out the box they lowered admission standards. No outreach, no ad campaigns to target Blacks ready for college, just BAM. Of course, the graduation rate among this new group of “scholars” was abysmal, but that didn’t matter, as long as the White administration got their Black quota, everything was fine.

Which brings me to the current crop of attacks by the left side of the blogosphere on Conservative pundit, and fellow Jersey ex-pat, Michelle Malkin whose John Doe Manifesto so offended the ‘netroots with its inherit bigotry that they had to respond … with racism.

The above link is a hateful screed on a typical “liberal” blog that has this to say about Malkin:

If your newspaper carries this hateful bitch – this self-loathing immigrant – contact the editorial board. We got Ann Coulter and Linda Bowles banished from the op-eds in this town – can we get the Star to come to their senses about this idiot child, too?

Emphasis mine. Now I’ve heard that Michelle Malkin was born in Philly and raised in Jersey (I already knew that, we recognize our own) so why is she an “immigrant?” Hmmmm, is the author saying that because her ancestors are from the Philippines that Malkin isn’t an American just like her? If you believe Malkin’s being bigoted (and for the record she’s not) why is it different than any other American being bigoted? Why is she self loathing, because she won’t agree with White liberals on immigration issues?

The answer of course is because this particular White “liberal” is angry that a minority has the temerity to disagree with her. The answer is because, like many of her ilk, this White “liberal” believes she can decide what minorities think and do, and if they don’t serve her ideological whims they’re “self loathing.” Though in point of fact it is the minority that agrees with every rhetorical excess of Whites in an effort to be accepted by the left that are self loathing, too self loathing to stand up for their own beliefs.

All the usual suspects are involved, so if you feel like getting dirty enough, you know where the sewers are. I won’t link to all of them, because unlike some people I’m not willing to get into bed with racists.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; the self righteous cloak of liberalism these people are so proud of always rests on top of well used Klan robes. It only takes one wrong word, or article, for the robes to come out.

Chavez Supporters on Rampage!

Publis Pundit has a report on Chavez supporting Communist mobs on a rampage against the “anti-revolutionary” privately owned TV station RCTV. The report is worth a read if only to see how bad things really are for people who love freedom in revolutionary Venezuela. As if to illustrate the point that Chavez supporters are little more then crazed thugs bent on causing pain and misery, you’ll notice that in the 5th pic down there’s a dead dog left under the vandals’ slogans. A dog that was no doubt terrorized and beaten to death by a group of wildly out of control “activists.”

h/t Michelle Malkin

The Doom that Comes to England

England, in the face of outrageous provocations from Iran and Jihadists within its own borders, responds to the world with with cowardice, appeasement and ultimately an invitation to outside forces to invade. Gone are the mythic stiff-lipped Brits that dwell in the popular American imagination, they’ve been replaced with neo-Marxist pacifists who aren’t willing to fight to defend their own countrymen, even when one is a mother. Iran has proved definitively to the world that not only is England a paper tiger, but that there are virtually no limits as to what sorts of aggressive actions the British people will accept in their attempts to avoid war.

And there is war in England now. The Islamic community is overrun with Wahabbists and openly flaunts its terror connection. Islamic “youth gangs” have turned the streets of English cities into war zones where non-Muslims are becoming increasingly targeted, frustrated, and radicalized. The next King of England may well be a Wahhabist himself, seeking to return England to the dark days of unopposed Monarchy with the help of his radical allies.

What will England do if a newly empowered Iran calls for war with the United Kingdom? What if Hezbollah cells begin attacking cities as they’ve done in Israel? What if the Iranian Navy sails to England and demands tribute? Will Americans have the will, or inclination, to aid the beleaguered English?

What comes to a nation of people unwilling to fight for their own survival? Many are asking this question, more are answering it. But for the British it is too late to change their course, war is upon them. The tiny island that once ruled the known world, now ruled over by political conceits and Utopian ideology, faces its doom. The Iranians have proved that they can conquer England without firing a shot, and now they will gather allies and do just that. The doom that comes to England will not be on the tip of a Iranian missile, but in the thousands of English citizens who will allow their nation to be destroyed.

Rally Against Islamo-Fascism at Ground Zero!

uac3.JPG

I attended the second annual Rally Against Islamo-Fascism held by the UAC at Ground Zero here in NYC. There was a great crowd at the rally as great speakers from groups on both sides of the political spectrum came together to stand against the attacks of Islamic Imperialists against the free peoples of the world. Ironically, while Americans were rallying in support of the captured British hostages and all the victims of the worldwide Jihad, the Britons were caving in to the mullahs of Iran.

uac6.JPG
(They could use a few more like her in England.)

Representatives from Gathering of Eagles, You Don’t Speak for Me and The Center for Vigilant Freedom gave passionate, inspiring speeches. Michelle Rojas of Stand With Us made an appearance in support of the event, and announced that along with Amcha they are planning an April 16th march on the U.N., an event Red Alerts will support and keep you updated about.

uac2.JPG
(Stand With Us had the best signs.)

Of course,there were bloggers aplenty, including a representative from Hip Hop Republican who gave a great speech. I didn’t catch his name, but the site is outstanding. There was even a little ‘net controversy as Ibrahim from FreeMuslims.org made a (admittedly long winded) speech voicing the concerns of patriotic moderate Muslims. This didn’t really sit well with the Loyalist Party contingent, whose leader (I think his name was Vito) later refuted the idea of there even being such a thing as moderate Islam.

Vito(?) made good points and he was actually right about one thing: there is an imperial impulse in Islam that has nothing to do with the current political climate or any country’s foreign policy. On the other hand, is it accurate to say that NO Muslims anywhere want to live in a secular republic? What about gay Muslims? What about the Druze who are not considered Muslim by other Muslims? Wouldn’t they be likely to side with freedom of religion in a secular country?

I’ve toyed with the idea of joining the Loyalist Party, but they just don’t seem to have the political acumen to make advances in NYC politics. Maybe I’m wrong though, but whether you think Freemuslims.org (and for the record I have my reservations about the accuracy of their portrayals of Islam) is on the level or not, having that sound bite and a nice kumbaya moment can do a lot to shut down the “you’re all bigots” crowd.

The Christian Action Network passed out some great pamphlets on the Jihad. Martin Mawyer also made a wonderful presentation at the rally. Any organization concerned about Islamic expansionism should think about investing in these booklets for distribution. They’ll change minds and hearts.

The best part of the rally was meeting so many patriots who cared about our country and the free peoples of the world. In NYC it can be awful lonely for a Republican, much less an old fashioned Reaganite like me. It was nice to see that even in the most liberal place on earth, there are still Americans willing to stand up for their country, and western civilization.

uac5.JPG
(Dave from Queens, a true patriot.)