After all there are more important threats to Women, particularly the affluent White women from the northeastern United States who are the real constituency so-called feminists represent. Meanwhile the supporters of a world wide caliphate march ever closer to their goal, over the bodies of dead women who American feminists are glad to ignore while sipping lattes and loudly proclaiming that they live in a fascist state.

The Islamist occupation of Iran has claimed another life, this time a young girl who was shot by security force in her own home. Kamangir uploaded the video and provided a translation for non Persian speaking viewers. It’s made it to Gateway Pundit, but it still remains unverified, though given the theocracy’s history of abusing women, I’d be shocked if this wasn’t true.

[youtube]UURb0VV4Vt0[/youtube]

But Iran isn’t the only country where women are being physically attacked by Islamist, as the case of Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasreen who was brutally attacked by a group of Muslim men recently. Those men have gone on to call for her death and are publicly planning a lynching at her house. What’s her crime you ask? She hurt Muslims feelings by expressing herself in books like this one.

Some of these Muslims are lawmakers in India. Imagine if some of our congress members did the same thing. Would feminists still be silent?

The lefts new heroes of Hamas have been caught forcing a women to convert to Islam and Christian teenage girls are disappearing in the Muslim world with alarming regularity.

Muslim YouTubers were still busy berating yours truly over my reluctance to accept that a 54 year old man marrying a 9 year old is acceptable, until the video said discussion was on was finally yanked down. Maybe YouTube finally figured out it was a pro-pedophilia vid. I blogged about these child rape supporting perverts before, although many feminists have not. Hmmm.

The Anti-Fascist Action, a left wing “direct action” group from Sweden who have been working tirelessly to intimidate those they claim are racists (but tend to target counter-Jihad activists and those who are seen as Islamaphobic) recently tied up and assaulted the girlfriend of controversial politician. From Gates of Vienna:

The girlfriend of the Martin Kinnunen, the chairman of the youth movement of Sverigedemokraterna [SD, the Sweden Democrats] was attacked Wednesday afternoon and tied up in her apartment in Stockholm. The assault took place after a longer period of threats.

Around 4:30 pm three men knocked on the door to Kinnunen’s apartment. Kinnunen wasn’t at home, and his 19-year old girlfriend opened the door. The men entered the apartment and threatened the girl with a knife, tied her up and put a gag on her using tape.

The woman was then dragged out of the apartment, where she fell and hurt herself. The three attackers fled the scene, leaving the woman lying in the stairway. A neighbor found her and alerted the police.

Though some on the left might be sympathetic to these Islamist allies supposedly anti-racist goals (I notice they’re not in Darfur defending the victims of Islamic imperialism) they couldn’t support binding and gagging a 19 year old girl at knife point and attempting to drag her off to do what ever they want with her. Or could they?

G.O.V. has more on this left wing auxiliary of Sweden’s Islamist bloc here and here, it’s worth a read and may help you understand why so called feminists are so eager to be out of the cross hairs of radical Muslims and the far left goons that support them.

I guess it’s up to us “wing nuts” to speak out for them, because they’re too scared to speak out themselves.

The Wahhabists have been a concern of civilized men for centuries, since their Malevolent founder first penned his vile and degenerate philosophy. Winston Churchill warned against the Wahhabists in the 1920’s, calling them” intolerant, well armed and blood-thirsty” and they’ve continued to spread their baleful vision of hell on earth until this very day. Western Resistance has a short but comprehensive essay that describes this malignant movement from it’s beginnings up until now and how it’s spreading it’s evil around the world. It also details how brutal and barbaric a Wahhabi government is and why we need to fight against Wahhabisms creeping influence:

The laws enforced at Saudi’s religious courts indicate a cavalier approach to human dignity. In March this year, a young woman who had run away from home was placed in a foster home for girls and was additionally sentenced to sixty lashes.

In November last year, Deutsche Presse Agentur reported that a young woman, who had been subjected to a violent gang rape by at last four assailants, was herself convicted of “khalwat”. Before the rape had taken place, she had been alone in a car with a man. As a result, she was sentenced to 90 lashes.

The following month, an Indian man working in Saudi wanted to visit his wife, who had just given birth to a son. He lost his way, and found himself in a Muslim-only area of Medina. His maroon residency visa (indicating he was a non-Muslim) was noticed, and he was reported to the police. A religious court sentenced him to be beheaded.

Beheadings take place in public, where a victim is made to kneel before having the head severed with a sword. There are numerous cases of female migrant workers who have defended themselves from employers’ rape attacks, who have been killed this way. The figures for decapitations in Saudi Arabia have increased dramatically this year. In 2005, 83 people were beheaded, but in 2006 this figure dropped to 38. In this year alone there have been 107 public decapitations.

Disgusting. If you can stomach it, you can enter the mind of a Wahhabist terror supporter here. If you scroll through his site you’ll see that he receives regular updates from terrorist around the world and gloats over U.S. deaths with demonic glee. There is no doubt that given the chance this savage would rape or murder our friends and loved ones because his murderous ideology tells him these things are good. We should ban Wahhabism before this evil leads to civil war and worse.

I wrote about this YouTube video a couple of days ago in which Northcali707 rambled on about how it’s a fine and decent thing to do to “marry” a 9 year old and have sex with her because she’s entering puberty and thus “mature.” Planning to shirk work that day, after doing a couple of posts I went to YouTube and began haranguing various people, which is technically marketing my blog because my screen name there links here, but in reality it’s just to see if I can make people cry.

One of Northcali’s supporters is 2dfaizi, a degenerate radical Islamists affiliated with the United Muslims forum. He claims that we can’t judge what another society does as wrong if everyone there accepts it isn’t (thank you multiculturalism) and that entering puberty means a girls ready for sex (married off to some older dude first of course) regardless of her age. I reasonably pointed out that by his logic slavery and Aztec human sacrifice was beyond reproach, and I put to him this simple question: If someone tried to marry a 9 yr old off to you, and she had menstruated (2d’s condition for sexual readiness) would you actually have sex with a child?

His response shouldn’t have shocked me, but it did:

What!?! He’s saying it might be unfashionable, but he’d probably have no problem marrying a 9-yr old. No problem getting it up for a child (pardon my language) and no regrets about forcing a child to fulfill his perverted desires. He’s arguing that even though he’s perfectly willing to molest children he isn’t a child molester, I’m just looking at things wrong.

He wants an exception to the law for Muslims to marry, and then rape, children. I know most Muslim men aren’t attracted to children, but this guy and his video making friend are painting sexual desire for children as Islamic, thus off limits for criticism.

“Who am I to judge?” he asks petulantly like some undergrad from a Woman’s Studies program offended by some dudes “no fat chicks allowed” t-shirt. What right does anyone have to lay down rules for the mighty 2dfaizi to follow? How do we dare question his sadistic desire to force a child into an unnatural relationship with an adult man who should be marring adult women?
According to my stats package, I get anywhere from 3-8 hits a day on this post about YouTube allowing Jihadi snuff films and underage girls in risque videos to be circulated because, in essence, they have a large audience of Muslims who enjoy those things. The hits mainly come from Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Europe. They all are searches for terms like “underage rape” “Youtube snuff girls” or “13 yr old having sex.” I was careful in the original post to not make a sweeping bigoted statement like “Muslims dig that stuff” but the fact is that the Islamists, followers of Taliban style ideologies, do dig that stuff.

It’s part of their appeal, perverts like 2dfaizi and and his ilk can be free to practice their sexual sadism with the full knowledge and approval of their leaders. Every dark fantasy they have, like raping school girls and stabbing babies can come true for these degenerates if they follow the nihilistic death cult set up by their leaders.

Is it any wonder New Yorkers are so upset about the Madrassa being set up here? Will young men there learn that sex with a girl who’s 9 is acceptable behavior? That raping girls who “by their right hand possess” is not a barbaric practice from the past, but a part of Islamic society that we have no right to interfere with?

I ask that the civilized Muslims I know are out there deal with this issue, that people like this be told in no uncertain terms that rape, child molestation and murder are unacceptable, unforgivable, and hopefully unislamic.