Has Putin’s KGB Killed Another Critic?

From Sky News:

The sudden death of an exiled Georgian billionaire may have been another “Alexander Litvinenko-style” murder, it is feared.

A major crime squad is investigating the death of 52-year-old Badri Patarkatsishvili, whose body was found at his country mansion in Surrey at about 11pm last night.

His family said he suffered a heart attack – but Surrey Police have launched an investigation to confirm the exact cause of death after reports of a plot to kill him.

Sky News’ home affairs correspondent Mark White said: “The police want to leave no stone uncovered.

“In the light of Litvinenko’s death in 2006 they are treating it very seriously and want to investigate properly to rule out foul play or to find out whether he was the subject of a hit.”

Mr Patarkatsishvili – Georgia’s richest man, with an estimated £6bn fortune – spoke recently of his fears for his life after one alleged plot against him was uncovered in London.

It has also been reported that an assassination plan bore chilling similarities to the killing of ex-KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko in 2006.

Mr Litvinenko – an outspoken critic of the Putin regime – was killed by radiation poisoning in London. Moscow has refused to extradite the prime suspect, ex-KGB bodyguard Andrei Lugovoi.

Talking about Mr Patarkatsishvili’s death at his home Downside Manor outside Leatherhead, a spokeswoman for Surrey Police said: “As with all unexplained deaths, it is being treated as suspicious.

My question is just what is England going to do about it if they found out Putin did have this guy killed? With the help of the European left, the American “anti-war” movement has saped the will of Americans to participate in wars meant to combat the spread of totalitarianism.

With Obama as President (something which looks pretty likely) and a Democratic House and Senate the chances of England being able to jump back into the protective cold war embrace of America are slim indeed.

It’s almost a cheery thought about the way our politics are going, that England, France and the E.U. will one day say ask us for help containing Russian aggression and will only receive some finger wagging about not being warmongers. Bye Bye England, I hope your friends the “peaceful Muslims” will feel like defending you from a resurgent Russia.

At Least 50% of Anti-Semitic Hate Crimes in Europe Committed by Muslims

And by “at least 50%” they of course mean all of them. From JPost:

Some 50 percent of anti-Semitic incidents on the European continent are connected to radical Islamic elements, according to a senior European Commission official.

the figure comes from European Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security Franco Frattini, who is responsible in the EU for combating racism and anti-Semitism in Europe. Frattini mentioned it in a conversation with Minister for Diaspora Affairs Isaac Herzog last week, and said it was based on European Union reports.

Frattini was in Israel last week for the Second European Union-Israel Seminar for Combating Racism and Anti-Semitism at the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem.

Herzog, who is responsible for coordinating government activities in combating anti-Semitism at the cabinet level, told The Jerusalem Post that it was “not new that Frattini relates a large percentage of anti-Semitic incidents to radical Islam, and it’s important to say, not Islam as such.”

According to Herzog, European governments are responding to this “aggressively,” including educating Muslim imams throughout the continent on “European values, principles of democracy, the rights of women and the like.”

Yeah. Let us know how that turns out.

England Equates Anti-Islamic Activity with Terrorism

England’s been on my mind recently, mainly due to the plight of much maligned blogger Lionheart who will become the first Christian martyr to the Islamic kingdom that surely will take the place of our stoic allies within a few years.

Lionheart’s crime is to be one of the few Englishmen to stand up for his country, a country where radical Muslims control entire neighborhoods; where the authorities are allowing sexual exploitation of children to flourish; where the standard of living has fallen so far below what one should expect from a civilized country that only those willing to lie can make the case that England is anywhere near America in quality of life.

Lionheart has recently done a wonderful interview that explains his plight and debunks the myth of his neo-Nazism quite nicely, but there is a new development in England that casts doubt on his ability to receive any type of fair trial in that benighted country.

The Daily Mail is reporting that England will replace the term “terrorism” with “anti-Islamic activity” in a move designed to appease Muslims and no doubt accelerate the Islamization of the United Kingdom:

Ministers have adopted a new language for declarations on Islamic terrorism.

In future, fanatics will be referred to as pursuing “anti-Islamic activity”.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said that extremists were behaving contrary to their faith, rather than acting in the name of Islam.

Security officials believe that directly linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.

In her first major speech on radicalization, Miss Smith repeatedly used the phrase “anti-Islamic”.

In one passage she said: “As so many Muslims in the UK and across the world have pointed out, there is nothing Islamic about the wish to terrorize, nothing Islamic about plotting murder, pain and grief.

“Indeed, if anything, these actions are anti-Islamic’.

Another section referred to enlisting the Muslim community against “anti-Islamic activity”.

Her words were chosen to reflect new Government strategy on labelling the terrorists and their recruiting agents.

The shift follows a decision taken last year to stop using the phrase “war on terror”, first adopted by U.S. President Bush.

Officials were concerned it could act as a recruiting tool for Al Qaeda, which is determined to manufacture a battle between the values of Islam and the West.

The strategy emerging across Government is to portray terrorists as nothing more than cold-blooded murderers who are not fighting for any religious cause.

The problem is that such a policy will eventually be used to conflate the “un-Islamic activity” of non-Muslims into terrorism. If it becomes accepted parlance to call Al-Qaeda an un-Islamic or anti-Islamic organization, then counter-jihadists, Muslim apostates and anti-Sharia activists become, by virtue of their anti-Islamic activity, as bad as Al-Qaeda.

This is more than a dangerous word game, but an attempt for a floundering leftist government to realign itself with Islamic Imperialists in England who will gladly disavow Al-Qaeda for a chance to make un-Islamic activities (like Homosexuality, Women’s rights and religious freedom) prosecutable, at least in the court of public opinion. This is Orwellian social engineering at it’s worst, and bloggers like Lionheart will be the first to fall prey to a new set of legal standards where being “anti-Islamic” will literally be treated as the same as crashing airplanes into the World Trade Center.

While I believe in freedom of religion, I’m not a Muslim and am not a big fan of Islam. I express often my disagreement with Islamic values and faith. Am I a terrorist? Is it terrorism to leave Islam, which is considered anti-Islamic? Is eating pork terrorism?

Philosophically, the English are well on their way to saying those things are.

England to Institute Red China-Like Organ Harvesting Program

And like Red China there could be no way a program like this would lead to wide spread human rights violations, like the state executing people for the express purpose of harvesting their organs.

From The Telegraph:

Gordon Brown has thrown his weight behind a move to allow hospitals to take organs from dead patients without explicit consent.

Writing in The Sunday Telegraph,the Prime Minister says that such a facility would save thousands of lives and that he hopes such a system can start this year.

The proposals would mean consent for organ donation after death would be automatically presumed, unless individuals had opted out of the national register or family members objected.

But patients’ groups said that they were “totally opposed” to Mr Brown’s plan, saying that it would take away patients’ rights over their own bodies.

Distasteful especially in how it ignores civilized norms of respecting the wishes of the dead, but the plan gets worse:

The Government will launch an overhaul of the system next week, which will put pressure on doctors and nurses to identify more “potential organ donors” from dying patients. Hospitals will be rated for the number of deceased patients they “convert” into donors and doctors will be expected to identify potential donors earlier and alert donor co-ordinators as patients approach death.

Meaning that as you go in for critical care, doctors will be under pressure to reach a certain goal of the fresh organ quota. Co-ordinators will be pressured to “convert” you to a donor. Sounds comforting.

Patient’s rights groups are appalled of course, as anyone should be, but it is this passage that I find most concerning:

While polls show 90 per cent of Britons are in favour of organ donation, 40 per cent of relatives refuse consent for the organs of their relatives to be donated, a figure which rises to 75 per cent among black and ethnic minorities. To solve this, the organ taskforce plans measures to boost donation, including putting pressure on doctors to identify patients as potential donors before they have died.

First off why is there a distinction between Black and ethnic minorities? Irrelevant to the story but indicative of the wide spread disenfranchisement of Blacks in England as the White establishment increasingly caters to a racist sub-group (East Asian Muslims) who share their disdain for Black people. That the journalist in this piece sees Blacks as different from all other ethnic minorities is troubling to say the least.

But what is worse is that the program moves to deny all those minorities the very same rights they claim they want them to have. It’s typical isn’t it? We have a country run by White liberals who will arrest a blogger speaking out about Islamic extremism on trumped up charges of racism, while plotting to ignore the valid religious and cultural objections of these same groups to having their bodies dismembered post mortum and divvied up amongst the favored patients of the bureaucrats who run the program.

That’s how it works in China, and to a lesser extent Spain which has a similar system. Organs are a commodity doled out to societal elites first. From the Human Rights Watch paper of Chinese organ harvesting:

While there are no statistics available detailing who the recipients of organ transplants are, the majority are probably mainland Chinese citizens. Government cadres, however, are reportedly given preferential status for organ procurement. Doctors at the Shenzhen People’s Armed Police Hospital told a former Intermediate Court judge that they would be particularly happy to accommodate his request to obtain a donated kidney for his brother, since they wanted the court to help in arranging a steady supply of executed prisoners’ organs.(80) And according to a recent investigative article in a Hong Kong magazine, hospitals usually make a special effort to meet expeditiously the needs of cadres requiring organ transplants:

In the senior cadre wards of high-level hospitals, organ needs are recorded promptly. Instructions from the [Party] leadership say that medical departments should naturally expend every possible effort to meet the needs of loyal servants of the revolution, and so organs from condemned prisoners are first of all reserved for their use. Long before the prisoner is executed…his or her health records, details of blood type and so forth will have been sent to the hospital, which then merely waits for the bullet being fired.(81)

Prompt organ transplant surgery is known to be widely available in China for high-paying foreign or overseas Chinese patients also. Patients are told exactly when they should arrive at the hospital, and the organs duly arrive on time. Quite how hospitals meet patient needs so quickly is a question with grave legal and medical ethics implications, for it would clearly suggest that execution dates are scheduled to conform with patient transplantation needs, rather than with the strict requirements of due legal process.

Are we to expect that a program set up by the socialist Labour party will not evolve into a similar system? Do you really believe that setting quotas for organ harvesting will have benign consequences?

We routinely see protests in England and here where Jews and Americans are accused of harvesting the organs minorities. The truth is that at this point we’re the only people who respect the dead enough not to treat them as a source for extra parts.

Hot Air takes a slightly different view.

About That High Standard of Living in England …

Times Online economics editor David Smith takes advantage of the declining dollar to make a claim so outrageous that I had reread the article several times to make sure it wasn’t a joke:

LIVING standards in Britain are set to rise above those in America for the first time since the 19th century, according to a report by the respected Oxford Economics consultancy.

The calculations suggest that, measured by gross domestic product per capita, Britain can now hold its head up high in the economic stakes after more than a century of playing second fiddle to the Americans.

It says that GDP per head in Britain will be £23,500 this year, compared with £23,250 in America, reflecting not only the strength of the pound against the dollar but also the UK economy’s record run of growth and rising incomes going back to the early 1990s.

In those days, according to Oxford Economics, Britain’s GDP per capita was 34% below that in America, 33% less than in Germany and 26% lower than in France. Now, not only have average incomes crept above those in America but they are more than 8% above France (£21,700) and Germany (£21,665).

He pulls out some good old fashioned World Worker Party style agi-prop to support his claim:

Although many people will be surprised by the figures, Americans have long complained that average incomes have been stagnant in their country. One often-quoted statistical comparison suggests that in real terms the median male full-time salary in America is no higher now than it was in the 1970s.

Patently absurd, which is no doubt why he doesn’t make any attribution of this bombshell. But even Comrade Smith can’t spin the truth about the superiority of our free markets to Britian’s semi-socialist, neo-liberal welfare state. When examining the Oxford Economics Consultancy study, he admits:

It concedes, however, that a significant fall in the pound against other currencies would push Britain back down the ladder. It has assumed an exchange rate of just over $2 for the purpose of the calculation but in recent days the pound has slipped below that level.

The Oxford analysts also point out that Americans benefit from lower prices than those in Britain. With an adjustment made for this “purchasing power parity”, the average American has more spending power than his UK counterpart and pays lower taxes. (In the run-up to Christmas many Britons traveled to New York and other American cities to take advantage of the strength of sterling against the dollar and those lower prices.)

So in other words, even if the British made roughly the same amount of money, a fiction only possible with some creative mathematics, they’d still be unable to match the lifestyle of an American in their same economic class. In fact, America’s market is so good English people travel here to benefit from not just the weak dollar, but from the purchasing power a free market gives to consumers.

But of course, standard of living is more than just the goodies you can buy, it’s little things like knowing that you won’t be arrested and thrown in jail for blogging.

Which England is doing right now to anti-Jihad blogger Lionheart. He’s being arrested for “inciting racial hatred” because he’s against the Islamization of England. I guess Islam’s a race now. He points out that radical Muslims have been allowed to spread vile hate speech for years unmolested.

And of course there’s this news from The Telegraph:

Islamic extremists have created “no-go” areas across Britain where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter, one of the Church of England’s most senior bishops warns today.

The Rt Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester and the Church’s only Asian bishop, says that people of a different race or faith face physical attack if they live or work in communities dominated by a strict Muslim ideology.

[…]

Bishop Nazir-Ali, who was born in Pakistan, gives warning that attempts are being made to give Britain an increasingly Islamic character by introducing the call to prayer and wider use of sharia law, a legal system based on the Koran.

In an attack on the Government’s response to immigration and the influx of “people of other faiths to these shores”, he blames its “novel philosophy of multiculturalism” for allowing society to become deeply divided, and accuses ministers of lacking a “moral and spiritual vision”.

So now England has “no-go zones” like France. Places where people who aren’t Muslims suffer physical attacks and the government is powerless to do anything other than capitulate and allow Sharia courts to be set up.

Almost like living in America. But wait, there’s more

More than 25,000 criminals have been escaped justice in England because the Crown Prosecution Service is overwhelmed by the sheer volume of cases. Instead of changing the system they simply drop charges against defendants who have a decent defense.

In 2006 it was reported that homicide rates had soared over ten years of Labour government domination.

Assaults and murders with knives are also on the rise. A couple of months ago it was reported that there is a knife attack every 24 minutes in England.

For someone who killed an old man by stoning him to death with his friends in front of his family, the British consider a two year sentence “tough.”

You can get more time for making a gay slur than for rape in England.

Also making a comeback in England: child sexual slavery.

And female genital mutilation.

Ready to pack your bags yet?