The recent under reported news of the Duke University associate director of the Center for Health Policy Frank Lombard being exposed as a child rapist who transmitted his molestation live on the Internet goes to show what I’ve said all along: pedophilia is an act not a orientation. In this case Frank Lombard gained access to his victims by adopting them with his gay partner. A gay partner that was not aware of Lombard’s degeneracy. Lombard clearly performed as a gay man well enough to fool his patsy live-in lover, and was apparently able to ingratiate himself into both the gay and academic community well enough to be above suspicion.
Even when he planned on adopting only boys.
It is perhaps the sign of my suspicious mind but if a straight man wanted to adopt only girls I would want him to be checked out rather thoroughly. Maybe I’m just a big hearted guy, but if I decided to adopt I wouldn’t have a preference for gender, only for a child that needed love. Lombard, under the cover of identity politics, ordered victims for the most vile perversions and no one suspected a thing until he was caught by undercover police raping the children on a webcam.
Lombard used the children as bait to lure other adult men to him, and it is in this fact we see that Lombard was not simply a “pedophile” pretending to be gay to access children. Lombard was using the children as a sexual accessory, in some instances a masturbatory aid, in other cases a reward to other men who we presume he was interested in. Lombard’s interest was in sadistically exploiting and abusing children as part of larger sexual fantasy life that had nothing to do with being “oriented” to children.
Those who abuse children have waged a successful campaign to convince the world that one can be a “pedophile” who is exclusively attracted to children, romantically as well as sexually. The reason for this is that it makes harshly punishing them seem less reasonable, especially when their crimes involve no contact with victims such as downloading child pornography. Child pornography, as this case aptly shows, is far from a victimless crime and there is no romantic love, no pure love, between a degenerate and a child.
Lombard didn’t “love” children, just as Alia Jacobson does not love the little girls she fantasizes about hurting, or Harold Spurling didn’t love the infants he raped. These people all are garden variety perverts for whom children were the preferred victims. Frank Lombard, contrary to popular myth, is in fact a gay man. Unlike most gay men he is also a sexual sadist who wanted to see other men abuse his children. We call this pedophilia when in fact it is simply rape. And just as straight men who rape women aren’t rape-o-sexuals gay or straight men who abuse children aren’t acting on an orientation, they’re simply bad people who belong in prison.
It has been established numerous times already that pedophilia is not an action by people a million times smarter and a million times more well informed than you. It is debatable whether it is a sexual orientation or not but it certainly is not an action. You cannot be arrested simply for pedophilia, and you cannot be a convicted pedophile.
It’s always just a matter of time until the pedophile activists and apologists come out of the woodwork.
rz, I dare you to find someone “a million times smarter and a million times more well informed” than Rob. It simply isn’t possible, and making such ludicrous suggestions doesn’t aid your mission to make it more mainstream to use children as sexual objects.
There is no such thing as pedophilia as you define it because no one is desperately, hopelessly attracted to children. There are criminally-minded animals who prey upon children because they are the most vulnerable among us. You can quibble over semantics, but you’re just making yourself look like the pervert you are.
rz-
A) There is no one “millions of times smarter” than me. Find someone who you’re talking about and I’ll go head to head with them.
B) Pedophilia is an activity participated in by garden variety perverts. Claim some mysterious smart person disagrees with me without presenting any evidence to the contrary doesn’t change that.
You are not the smartest person in the world Rob, if you think you are then you are absolutely insane.
I am not a pedophile apologist nor am I a pedophile activist of any sort, I just believe that pedophilia is not what the mainstream media and the general public think it is. I guess I feel this way because I am not some blind sheep following the herd, I am actually capable of thinking for myself.
I believe that the vast majority of heterosexual men have an attraction to prepubescent and pubescent girls, they just cannot bring themselves to accept it. Girllove has always been common, just look at Japan and the girl modeling industry in eastern europe.
I don’t have an attraction to children. Men I know don’t sit around getting hot looking at prepubescent children. Only people interested in the unnatural, in hurting others, see children as sexual objects. By claiming every man is sexually interested in children (a lie) you are apologizing for child rape.
Japan is a country emasculated by a pacifist constitution forced on them by a country who “protects” them from the world. Suicide is also common in Japan, shall we accept that killing yourself is also natural?
Eastern Europe is known to traffic in children for sexual purposes. Is that natural too?
That’s ONE INDIVIDUAL CASE. That doesn’t “prove” anything. Accepting evidence from a single case as proof of a conjecture is pseudoscientific. I’d expect much betetr from such a reputable university.
Pedophilia is most definately a sexual orientation. Think about it this way. It’s not “natural” to be attracted to prepubescent children, because they can not reproduce. It’s also not “natural” to be attracted to members of the same sex, because they can not reproduce. How come, then, is homosexuality a sexual orientation, but pedophilia a mental disorder? There’s no essential difference.
You didn’t read my post, just the title. I will respond anyway.
As I have pointed out dozens of time there are no “pedophiles” who are only sexual inside their own self-expressed preferences. Child rapists (and that’s what they are) who claim to be attracted only to ‘tween girls have been caught raping infants and molesting girls.
Your example suggests that two same sex adults and an adult raping a child are in some way the same. This is asinine. Two Sarah Lawrence grads butching it up at the Lilith Fare is in no way the same as 30-year-old man molesting a child and you know it.
As for your ridiculous “natural” argument. This is where you were your most stupid. You can’t reproduce getting a blowjob, is it unnatural to want one? You can’t reproduce getting a lap dance, is it unnatural to want one? The so-called pedophile is not having sex with a tiny adult who can’t get pregnant, but a child who is physically and emotionally undeveloped. He or she preys on the weak to satisfy a desire for dominance or for a partner that can’t make demands on them. They are not more attracted to children than adults, simply more interested in perversions and victims. I am unaware of any “pedophile” who is not a sadist. Perverted Justice often posts the transcripts of pedophiles online and all the world can see that most are nothing but garden variety degenerates who want to abuse someone.
As for your strawman about mental illness. I’ve never said they were crazy. They are evil. A pedophile is just a rapist who doesn’t believe they can overpower a grown woman.
I’d say you should be ashamed of yourself for writing this, but clearly you are since you won’t sign your name to it. You’re a disgusting and vile person to argue this, and the sooner you kill yourself, which I know you’ve thought of in the past (I am psychic after all) the better off the world will be.
The chocolate fountains with all the fresh fruits. That is always a hit.