Or his new target Dodia Fae, the CEO of Pagans Against Child Abuse who just wrote a magnificent expose of pedophiles on Ning that led to the closure of at least six networks that traded in graphic and sometimes violent child pornography. And of course his favorite target Absolute Zero United is also mentioned in the latest blog post by degenerate pedophile and unemployed alcoholic Michael James Gregg who is better known in the online pedophile community as Zman.
On his blog Sex Offender Issues Gregg makes some completely spurious and outrageous claims about Red Alerts, PACA and Absolute Zero that are actually libelous. Long time readers will see the irony as Gregg was the pervert who tried to get professional cretin Tom Madison to sue me for libel. They of course had no case, since calling a child raping degenerate a pervert is not libel. Truth, you see, is an absolute defense to libel charges.
Gregg however likes to play fast and loose with the truth:
Wow, it seems we have a huge cult out there, who pretend to be “for the children” who troll illegal web sites, find and view child porn, and they are associated with Absolute Zero United, Red-Alerts, and others.
How is this not illegal? They admit in their forums, to seeing child porn (see link below). How is it not illegal for a self proclaimed “for the children” cult, who troll illegal web sites, not illegal?
NOTE: All links are viewed through the Anonymouse proxy!
http://pagansagainstchildabuse.ning.com/forum/topics/predators-among-us
Sounds like the FBI needs to check them out!!
What do others think? You be the judge!
http://pagansagainstchildabuse.ning.com/
http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/
http://www.red-alerts.com/
I didn’t bother to format the post to match Gregg’s use of various colors and font sizes to make it have more “punch” but you get the idea. The only problem here is that he’s lying. There are no forums on Red Alerts that he would have seen me claim to troll illegal sites.
PACA has forums but none say anything about trolling illegal sites. PACA does in fact have a campaign where they encourage people who come across child porn to report it to the proper authorities. The expose says that while looking through the network list of a PACA member she was suspicious about she found several sites that were trading in child porn, and she immediately reported each one. This is a far cry from the charge that PACA members are trading in child porn. Again a malicious lie.That term is important so keep it in mind.
Absolute Zero also doesn’t have a forum per se, but does have an active comments section. AZ also publishes exposes of online pedophiles using the Perverted Justice Wikisposure resource. Perverted Justice and maybe some AZ members do monitor pro-pedophile discussion forums, but they do not trade in child pornography or join illegal sites. This is lie, and one that maliciously is being told to harm the reputation of a person or group.
So what is libel? From Media Law Resource Center:
Libel and slander are legal claims for false statements of fact about a person that are printed, broadcast, spoken or otherwise communicated to others. Libel generally refers to statements or visual depictions in written or other permanent form, while slander refers to verbal statements and gestures. The term defamation is often used to encompass both libel and slander.
In order for the person about whom a statement is made to recover for libel, the false statement must be defamatory, meaning that it actually harms the reputation of the other person, as opposed to being merely insulting or offensive.
The statement(s) alleged to be defamatory must also have been published to at least one other person (other than the subject of the statement) and must be “of and concerning” the plaintiff. That is, those hearing or reading the statement must identify it specifically with the plaintiff.
The statement(s) alleged to be defamatory must also be a false statement of fact. That which is name-calling, hyperbole, or, however characterized, cannot be proven true or false, cannot be the subject of a libel or slander claim.
In other words, me calling a sex offender a degenerate pervert is not libel, but Gregg claiming I am engaged in illegal activities I’m clearly not is libel. Now if only Gregg weren’t an unemployed hillbilly I’d have myself some sweet, sweet, settlement cash, but no doubt it’d cost more money to sue Gregg than I could ever hope to squeeze out of him or his cankles. Sigh. It’s always the poor folks who libel you.
I’ve always put forward that except in the most extreme cases pedophiles and other perverts are not “sick” and don’t have a different orientation than everyone else, they’re simply bad people. Criminals who need to take advantage of children to feel powerful and like common thieves all are liars. In Gregg’s case an almost pathological immaturity no doubt plays a part in his constant need to create a fantasy world where people opposed to child exploitation are the real villains and a man who is a known child molester is the good guy.
Gregg is the true villain though, taking no responsibility for his own life and implying that wanting children to be able to grow up without being raped is some sort of hell worthy sin. That’s why he lashes out constantly, this new salvo aimed at PACA because no doubt either he or one of his friends is afraid of getting caught up in the coming dragnet. Or he might be angry because someone reported a couple of his video pages and they got yanked down by providers. Tee-hee!
So go ahead and cry about us Zman. At least we know all the time you put into us isn’t being used targeting some other kid that you’ll “accidentally” masturbate in front of. Filthy pervert.