Via Michelle Malkin
Category Archives: Blacklist
John Edwards Has No Shame
Even in pre-cancer days I thought some of the criticism of Edwards was a bit unfair. His armchair socialism tempered only by his conspicuous displays of ill gotten wealth should be enough fodder for a hundred anti-Edwards diatribes, yet the attacks on Edwards are often attacks on his perceived effeminacy (like Hot Air calling him “Silky Pony”) or hit pieces like Kirsten Powers’ infamous “John Edwards Loves Virtual Child Porn” post from a few months ago.
But the news that John Edwards collected the e-mails of his wife’s well wishers then spammed them in the hopes they would give to Edwards campaign is the most outrageous thing I’ve ever heard. There is nothing more disgusting than a grifter using someone’s illness as a way to part his marks from their money. It’s worse when the ill person is related to the grifter, proving that the only feelings this sociopath has are greed, avarice, and a sense of intellectual superiority that leads him to think others can’t see through him. It’s not just a repellent scheme, but it’s so transparent that it becomes disrespectful to the victims.
Edwards is a lawyer so this wasn’t as shocking as it should of been which is more of a commentary on the state of the legal profession than on Edwards. But Edwards is using his wife’s cancer to raise money right in front of her. She must feel very proud seeing her husband jump right back on the horse after such devastating news and start collecting money on the back of her cancer.
Edwards says there are two Americas, well I for one will stay in mine, where a husband puts his life on hold to be with his sick wife, and I hope Edwards stays in his.
Kos Kid Slanders Drudge with Phony Child Porn “satire”
They took the offending post down, but The Post-Post Modernist transcribed the unseemly hit piece in its entirety. 186 K per Second has a screen shot and a link to the Google cache, complete with the vile comments you come to expect from the idle nouveau riche who are the main source of support for ‘netroots activism. Comments like this one from diarist JeckyllnHyde in response to another Kossacks worries that this joke may have gone too far:
” Please! (3+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
cathy b, chumley, kherevabut this journal goes a little too far.
Nothing we say or do here to malign this sleazeball will ever counter the outrageous claims Drudge and Faux News have made re: Democratic politicians for a number of years.
They deserve our ridicule and contempt.”
How’s that for reasonable debate? The author claims the post was satire, but many in his audience didn’t seem to be in on the joke. Elliot, who seems to believe almost anything he’s seen on the Internet is true, certainly didn’t realize this oh-so-funny post was a joke when he said:
“The Party of Perverts (1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Tiganaalways have their pants down. Now they’re caught? God, I hope this is true.”
It says something about a man that he hopes that someone is an avid collector of child porn. I always hope the opposite, to each his own I guess.
There’s more, but like I’ve said before, there’s only so long I’ll sit in the gutter, so see for yourself and be prepared to be shocked. Drudge hasn’t lowered himself to respond, but I’m sure his lawyers will.
h/t Hot Air
‘Netroots Show Their True Colors (Klan White)
Though many people disagree with me, I believe ALL White “Liberals” are racists, and that modern liberalism, distinct from what used to be mainstream Democratic thought, is inherently racist. Modern liberalism, which is little more than a secularized cult of radical Christianity, instills in its adherents a belief in the inferiority of non-Whites evidenced by their inability (in “liberals'” eyes) to succeed in our country without the constant guidance and attention Whites. At the same time this attitude creates a racist view of non-Whites who don’t accept liberal dogma as betraying not just liberalism, but their own race. This is due to the belief common among so-called progressives that minorities in America are better off following the orders of White liberals who know what is in the best interest of those groups, and are more qualified than minorities to set an “empowering” agenda for non-Whites.
In this atmosphere, a Black or Filipina woman who is decidedly conservative becomes a target for the latent hostility the White liberal feels toward the groups he or she “just wants to help” but aren’t sufficiently grateful for their efforts. A minority of any political persuasion who openly disagrees with the modern “progressive” is lucky to be only dismissed, but more often than not finds themselves on the receiving end of hateful racism that would seem more at home at a Klan rally than among the enlightened liberal masses.
I realized all this years ago, in high school and later college when time and again supposedly liberal academics and students would tell me things like “If you reform welfare, Blacks will starve!” or that “Women shouldn’t be held to the same standards as men in math, that wouldn’t be fair.” The school I got my undergraduate degree from wanted to increase Black enrollment in the ’90’s, so right out the box they lowered admission standards. No outreach, no ad campaigns to target Blacks ready for college, just BAM. Of course, the graduation rate among this new group of “scholars” was abysmal, but that didn’t matter, as long as the White administration got their Black quota, everything was fine.
Which brings me to the current crop of attacks by the left side of the blogosphere on Conservative pundit, and fellow Jersey ex-pat, Michelle Malkin whose John Doe Manifesto so offended the ‘netroots with its inherit bigotry that they had to respond … with racism.
The above link is a hateful screed on a typical “liberal” blog that has this to say about Malkin:
If your newspaper carries this hateful bitch – this self-loathing immigrant – contact the editorial board. We got Ann Coulter and Linda Bowles banished from the op-eds in this town – can we get the Star to come to their senses about this idiot child, too?
Emphasis mine. Now I’ve heard that Michelle Malkin was born in Philly and raised in Jersey (I already knew that, we recognize our own) so why is she an “immigrant?” Hmmmm, is the author saying that because her ancestors are from the Philippines that Malkin isn’t an American just like her? If you believe Malkin’s being bigoted (and for the record she’s not) why is it different than any other American being bigoted? Why is she self loathing, because she won’t agree with White liberals on immigration issues?
The answer of course is because this particular White “liberal” is angry that a minority has the temerity to disagree with her. The answer is because, like many of her ilk, this White “liberal” believes she can decide what minorities think and do, and if they don’t serve her ideological whims they’re “self loathing.” Though in point of fact it is the minority that agrees with every rhetorical excess of Whites in an effort to be accepted by the left that are self loathing, too self loathing to stand up for their own beliefs.
All the usual suspects are involved, so if you feel like getting dirty enough, you know where the sewers are. I won’t link to all of them, because unlike some people I’m not willing to get into bed with racists.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; the self righteous cloak of liberalism these people are so proud of always rests on top of well used Klan robes. It only takes one wrong word, or article, for the robes to come out.
White Liberals Angry that Black Caucus won’t Carry their Water
News that the Congressional Black Caucus will be co-sponsoring a debate with the dreaded Fox News Channel has White “liberals” in an uproar that exposed the klan robes usually tucked beneath their cloak of self-righteous egalitarianism. The decision by the C.B.C. to sponsor a Democratic primary debate on the top rated cable news channel, a sound political decision for a group seeking to get its message out to more people, was predictably seen as a betrayal by the racist “progressives” who believe minorities, specifically Blacks, owe them their undying loyalty.
They repay that loyalty by continually voting for Robert Byrd and ignoring the Southern Poverty Law Center’s dire warnings concerning the genocide against Black Americans being committed by Mexican gangs in Los Angeles.
But White “liberals,” despite their own betrayals, are scandalized by the C.B.C. making a decision without the benevolent guidance of their “superiors” in the progressive movement. They’re shocked that the C.B.C. is colluding with an organization these Whites claim is “racist,” the proof they offer being a badly edited video montage of out-of-context clips that they assume will fool we non-Whites. You know, because we’re all stupid.
MyDD is using propaganda by supposed Black man and MoveOn storm trooper James Rucker. As a man of Black blood myself (half of it anyway) I am more than a little offended by Rucker tap dancing for Whites on this issue, making the case that big evil Fox should be considered racist because some White guys decided it was so. If Rucker is Black (and not some White guy with a tan, as his Huffpo bio pic suggests) then he’s acting as a mouth piece for Whites who had no problem with Black facing opponents in their political campaigns, and who now are trying to smear other Whites as racists. He has no problem with that either.
Whites of any political stripe have no say in Black Liberation. This may sound harsh, and White “liberals” are almost always offended by this, but it is necessary. Liberation means more then just getting to toe the party line of the left or the right, it means making decisions that Whites may not like, and are in the best interest of Black Americans. Fox News reaches thousands more people than its competitors, therefore the C.B.C. can get better visibility for the candidates, and their own mission, if they deal with Fox. Rucker may not like Fox, but he should like the C.B.C. becoming a major player in the elections. So Rucker, and any minority, should support whatever decision the C.B.C. makes.
I guess his White friends won’t let him.
UPDATE: I attempted to post similar sentiments on his HuffPo post, but my comments were denied.