On Labor Day a group of up to 20 “men” and boys gang raped an 11-year-old girl with the assistance of a 16-year-old girl and another adult woman who was there at the time. What About Our Daughters has been covering the case and has just posted about one of the degenerate pervert’s sentencing hearings. Some of the younger rapists have gotten off basically scot-free with a few years in Juvenile Detention and the Supreme Court has ensured that the adults need not worry about the punishment they truly deserve.
Within this horror story we have a quote from 22-year-old LaToya Bell, a friend of the gang-rapists and a woman who has some nuanced beliefs about gender equality and the validity of American social mores:
A number of women in the girl’s neighborhood said the males involved were good people who made bad decisions.
“Five years? Ten years? That’s ridiculous,” said LaToya Bell, 22, sitting on a porch with four others who nodded in agreement. “They (are) getting time for nothing. That girl, she knew what she was doing.”
“That girl” is an 11-year-old child who was gang raped. Even if she “knew what she was doing” what LaToya, with the full support of her four gutterslut friends, is saying is that rape, child molestation and sexual sadism with children is acceptable.
Forget for a second the self-loathing, violent homo-eroticism that is at the core of any man who participates in a gang-rape, the misogyny driven by jealousy of women stealing the attention of other men from the rapist that is the fuel for his libido, and the rank perverse evil of sexually violating pre-pubescent children. Let’s assume that LaToya fathoms none of this and just believes this girl “wanted” to have sex with a large group of men. What kind of sexual deviant is she that she thinks it’d be O.K. as long as the girl’s willing?
What sort of disgusting trollop not only blames the victim of of a gang rape for her brutalization, but thinks it’s perfectly normal for a) a group of up to 20 men to all have sex with one woman and b) adult men and teenagers to be attracted to and have sex with 11-year-olds? Besides trollops who are hell bent on ensuring that Black Americans look like barbarians I mean.
As a Bi-racial man I’ll just share a rueful head shake with Barack Obama the next time I run into him in Whole Foods and sigh heavily while saying “That’s why I moved out of East Orange.” He’ll agree while we amble through the bakery sampling the rosemary baguettes then he’ll say something like “but I’m still proud of where I came from,” perhaps a little too loudly if only to placate the shrewishly glaring Michelle.
Yeah, me too.
The commenters at What About Our Daughters aren’t as forgiving of Bell as the B-man and I are. And surprise! Francis Holland doesn’t give a crap about this girl being abused because he’s got more important things to blog about. Then again it fell to Ron Paul supporting N.A.U. truthers to rally for Jamiel’s Law because as Holland wrote to me in the comment thread on this post, caring about Black folk getting raped and killed won’t get Obama elected, reaching out to the people who do the killing will. Stay classy, Francis.
Also staying classy, the increasingly nutrooty blogger Charles Johnson whose readers at LGF are busily condemning anyone who thinks Dixiecrat parasite Jessie Helms was an evil bigot whose main “accomplishment,” besides benefiting from Reagan’s party discipline policy, was to break that same policy by attempting to rob fellow Republican Martin Luther King of his well earned holiday. The irony is that a woman named Natalie was just banned form LGF for “supporting fascists” because she simply agreed with someone Johnson doesn’t. Yet I don’t see the mass banning of lizards who loved Helms yet. Hypocrisy at it’s finest!