Leftists Continue to Push the Myth of the Pedophile Orientation

Gawker recently published an editorial claiming among other things that at least 20% of child molesters are exclusively oriented toward molesting children. Despite the fact that thy give no examples of such people they go on to make the astounding claim that we should feel sorry for them and worse that “progressives” should be comfortable allowing these degenerates to live next door to them. 

I am working on an essay rebutting this sinister piffle for Red State but I’ve written about this before and am re-printing this article I wrote more than a year ago about the push to normalize sexual abuse and exploitation

An expert witness from the University of Montreal made this astonishing claim in front of a parliamentary committee debating a bill that would increase Canada’s punishment of pedophiles:

“Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offence from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality,” emphasized Van Gijseghem.

“True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation.  You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation.” He added, however: “He may however remain abstinent.”

This claim is astonishing because Dr. Hubert Van Gigjseghem portrays himself as an expert in “extra-familial sexual abuse” and forensic psychology, yet he appears completely unaware of the actual classifications of child molesters. Few child abusers are exclusively attracted to children and those who are generally fall into the either the “mysoped” category – sadists who seek to harm children for sexual gratification – or the “fixated” child molesters whose interest in children is a symptom of pathological immaturity.

The vast majority of so-called pedophiles are “situational” offenders. These people have no real interest in children but for a variety of reasons prey on them for sexual gratification, mainly because children are easier victims to manipulate and control.

Leftists have long accepted the “orientation” argument from pedophiles, partly driven by their blind acceptance of the fraudulent Alfred Kinsey reports that were used to normalize adults molesting children and partly influenced by the “pro-choice” feminist culture which devalues children and sees them as objects that shouldn’t be allowed to get in the way of an adult’s interests. But increasingly, people on the right, especially libertarians, have also accepted this view of child sexual exploitation as an “orientation.”

But there is no “pedophile” orientation, as anyone who has read about a sexual abuse case can tell you.

Take the recent example of Steven Demink of Michigan. Demink posed as a psychologist named Dalton St. Clair online and used a male model’s headshot as part of the deception. It is alleged that using this fake profile, Demink targeted single mothers on the Internet, telling them to molest their own children (on video) as part of a form of ‘therapy’ he created. Several women did just that and sent the footage to him. So far a Virginia Beach woman named Rebecca Nail and a 31-year-old woman from Florida named Candice Miller have been charged.

There are several other women who haven’t been charged yet. All molested the children with the expectation that they would be able to date the fictional Dr. Dalton St. Clair. These women molested children, filmed themselves doing it and sent those images to a man they met online in a bid to win his affection.

What orientation is that? Are they “pedophiles” or simply situational offenders?

In 2008 Kendra D’Andrea ended up in court when it was found that she not only allowed her long distance trucker boyfriend to rape her 8-year-old daughter, but she filmed the attacks and participated in the rapes. It should be noted that her “pedophile” boyfriend maintained a sexual relationship with Kendra. Are either of these people, who used a child as an accessory to their sex life, simply oriented toward abusing children as foreplay?

Just a few days ago, a 25-year-old named Randell Duffell traveled from Alabama to South Carolina to have sex with a 14-year-old girl he met online. Is the 25-year-old preying on teens for sex differently oriented from you and me, or just morally bankrupt? Do we believe that Randell prefers young teens to grown women, or is it just easier for him to gain access to them?

The answers here are obvious. People who exploit children for sex are no different than rapists or thieves. Just as rapists aren’t “roughsexosexuals” and “chokeophiles,” the child molester isn’t a person sexually oriented toward children. They are criminals who feel a sense of entitlement to their own gratification. Children are preyed on because they are unable to do what adults can – refuse. Most supposed pedophiles participate in sexual activity with adults on a regular basis, abusing children when the opportunity arises.

The view of people who prey on children as “grappling” from a orientation they can’t control is at odds not just with accepted research but with the reality we can see with our own eyes in the hundreds of news reports we see every day. The danger of this view should be obvious: it minimizes the moral responsibility of criminals while shielding them from the harsh punishment and social ostracism that is the only real deterrence to these crimes.

Possibly Cannibalistic Pedophile Ring Caught Trading Snuff porn

Next time someone asks you why you need a gun send them this link. If you don’t have a strong stomach I’ll summarize. Two perverts were caught with child porn including pictures of decapitated child who’d been cooked. They also chatted about raping, murdering and eating toddlers. Don’t worry, the family of one perverts says it was all in good fun.

Buy a gun, now. The world is ending.

Detroiters Ignore Crawling, 86-Year-Old Carjacking Victim

“It ain’t my business” is business as usual in Detroit.

In 1985, I was 15 and crawling on the side of the road after a hip fracture had laid me low.  Traffic was busy.  I was in obvious pain and waving for help.  No cars stopped.  A gas station clerk eventually came out to help me but didn’t initially because from far away she couldn’t tell if I was one of the homeless drunks that walked the neighborhood.  At least that’s what she said.  This was in the crappy suburb of Detroit I lived in at the time.  I’m pretty damn sure I didn’t resemble a homeless drunk from far away or close up, but hey it was the 80’s.  We wore some weird clothes.

In 2012, in Detroit proper, 86-year-old WWII veteran, Aaron Brantley, on his way home from Bible study was attacked and carjacked by a 21-year-old thug at a gas station.   He crawled with a broken leg to the gas station store to get help while passersby ignored him.  A surveillance video shows that once he made it into the store he was ignored even then.  Finally, one customer picked him up and drove him home.

I guess things haven’t changed much in the city and the burbs.

I know how this looks to outsiders.  Being from the area, I know there are good people here but this makes us look like a bunch of animals.  I can even understand not wanting to get involved when you think something is fishy.  But an 86-year-old man crawling on the ground?  Seriously?  Isn’t this taking the not my business attitude a bit too far?  Mr. Brantley has gotten an outpouring of support since the incident.  But you have to wonder how much of that is a result of shame.

The thug has been apprehended and the car found.  Incidentally, this car was a replacement for one that was previously stolen.  Mr. Brantley was fighting evil when he was probably younger than the cretin who attacked him.  Can this veteran from the greatest generation catch a break?

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtuXfGtOrPg]


Sexually Exploiting Children Now Considered “Pretty Minor”

You don’t have to watch professional finger wagger Bill O’Reilly to run across the trend of child molesters being treated with kid gloves. Stitches77 from Absolute Zero United just posted a piece that shows this trend is international is scope. In that post we meet a judge/folk musician/dedicated “civil libertarian” by the name of Ian Dearden who is at the center of a travesty of justice so profound I fully expect Bill O’Reilly’s head to explode when he hears about it:

A Queensland father who bashed a man caught molesting his 10-year-old son is facing a prison sentence, while the boy’s attacker walks free.

Shane Thomas Davidson was at the child’s house at Eagleby in June last year to watch the State of Origin match with the boy’s father and a few other people. After the game, Davidson went into the boy’s bedroom and began massaging the child’s penis under his clothes. When the boy woke up, Davidson asked the boy to show him his penis and offered to do the same. The child refused and went to tell his father what happened. The man then attacked Davidson, dragging him outside, throwing him on to a concrete path where he struck his head and repeatedly kicking him. Davidson later underwent extensive facial surgery in the Princess Alexandra Hospital.

Shane Thomas Davidson was spared jail despite pleading guilty to molesting the boy on State Of Origin night last year. Judge Ian Dearden told Beenleigh District Court the sentence was reduced because the young victim’s father had wrongly taken action into his own hands and badly beaten Davidson.

In handing down his sentence on Monday, Justice Dearden said adult offenders who committed sex offences against children must serve actual jail time – unless exceptional circumstances were found to exist.

“This is one of those rare and exceptional cases,” he said. “When an individual takes the matter of punishment into their own hands, the offence committed by the person may be far, far more serious and, therefore, have far more serious consequences then the original offence.”

Say what? Beating the crap out of a man who molested your son is worse than molesting a child? Understand that the judge here is saying if you caught a man molesting your child the beating you gave that person would be worse than the rape of the child. In fact, Ian Dearden agreed with the pedophile who thought what he did wasn’t something you should go to jail for.

Dearden also believes coercing a teen into sex through force isn’t rape, as he was the author of another outrageous ruling:

A Former north Queensland high school teacher has been jailed after a court overturned his suspended sentence for molesting a female student.

Steven Peter Quick, 29, of Varsity Lakes on the Gold Coast, originally avoided jail when Brisbane District Court Judge Ian Dearden sentenced him to a wholly suspended 18-month jail term and 12-month intensive correction order.

Justice de Jersey found that Judge Dearden didn’t take enough notice of the damage done to the victim, that he incorrectly regarded as relevant that she gave “some level of consent”, and that he did not give enough weight to Quick’s threats to harm the girl.

The chief justice also found that Quick’s remorse was only self-pitying and he lacked true insight into the damage he had done.

So a person threatens a teenage girl into being violated and Dearden thinks that’s a kind of consent?

This attitude is not new, in fact it’s very European and thus trendy among hard leftists. England is full of cases where rape and child exploitation are dealt wth lightly, if at all. One judge there claimed an 11-year-old girl raped by an adult was “asking for it” since she was dressed provocatively according to him. That same judge refused to deport an illegal alien who raped a 12-year-old because he thought the rapist wasn’t dangerous.

The Ivy towers of Cambridge University host a degenerate named Dr. Nicholas Hammond who was caught with child pornography that included babies as young as two days old being raped. America’s own N.P.R. just ruffled some feathers with this obsequious piece about over rated Somali poet Elmi Bodheri who became famous for penning a series of sexually graphic love poems to a nine-year-old. Bodheri was in his 30s. N.P.R.’s Gwen Thompson glosses over that fact in the story as if it was inconsequential.

The tie that binds all these stories together is nihilism. The children being abused in these cases simply don’t matter to the judges and journalists who have adopted the Albert Camus like pretensions that nothing really matters in the scheme of things. When morality becomes individually subjective in a society then people are free to impose injustice on others. All adults have a responsibility to protect children and teens. We all share the responsibility to allow children to remain innocent, to keep them from having to see the world as an unfair and corrupt place where they are never truly safe from depravity. Only the most nihilistic of cultures abdicates that responsibility, and sides with those who prey on innocents.

It is a sign of our decadence reaching the peak at which it comes crashing down on our civilization to produce men who think raping a child is “pretty minor” and certainly it is a sign that our civilization is collapsing to have the authorities of so many countries agreeing.

The Dark Worship: Alia Loren Jacobson and the Celebration of Evil


Alia Loren Jacobson, also known online as Alia Lorae A.K.A. Poisontears is a singer, actress, and writer with a large web footprint. She also is a depraved fiend who admits to being concerned with her sadistic sexual fantasies involving bloodletting and maiming girls from the ages of 7-14. She is the textbook blood fetishist.

Rather than seek help for her disturbance, she went to pro-child rape forum Girlchat where she promptly received validation and encouragement for her sickest and most twisted desires. The embracing of bloodletting fantasies about children is shocking coming from the self-professed “girl lovers” who lurk on the Internet if only because they spend so much time trying to convince people that they are not evil, but they are not the only people who have encouraged and minimized Alia’s sickness of the soul.

Continue reading