College Presidents (and Perverts) Band Together to Lower the Drinking Age

It’s called the Amethyst Initiative and according to proponents the current drinking age encourages binge drinking in people under 21. Yeah, that’s exactly what they’re saying:

College presidents from about 100 of the nation’s best-known universities, including Duke, Dartmouth and Ohio State, are calling on lawmakers to consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, saying current laws actually encourage dangerous binge drinking on campus.

The movement called the Amethyst Initiative began quietly recruiting presidents more than a year ago to provoke national debate about the drinking age.

“This is a law that is routinely evaded,” said John McCardell, former president of Middlebury College in Vermont who started the organization. “It is a law that the people at whom it is directed believe is unjust and unfair and discriminatory.”

Other prominent schools in the group include Syracuse, Tufts, Colgate, Kenyon and Morehouse.

But even before the presidents begin the public phase of their efforts, which may include publishing newspaper ads in the coming weeks, they are already facing sharp criticism.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving says lowering the drinking age would lead to more fatal car crashes. It accuses the presidents of misrepresenting science and looking for an easy way out of an inconvenient problem. MADD officials are even urging parents to think carefully about the safety of colleges whose presidents have signed on.

“It’s very clear the 21-year-old drinking age will not be enforced at those campuses,” said Laura Dean-Mooney, national president of MADD.

Both sides agree alcohol abuse by college students is a huge problem.

Research has found more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependance. One study has estimated more than 500,000 full-time students at four-year colleges suffer injuries each year related in some way to drinking, and about 1,700 die in such accidents.

A recent Associated Press analysis of federal records found that 157 college-age people, 18 to 23, drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005.

Right. The fact is I’ve been clean and sober nearly eight years so I’m biased, but I can objectively tell you that binge drinking isn’t caused by having to hide your drinking or not being taught how to “drink right” but by the drinker’s inability to deal with various problems they have. Shyness, depression or the general ennui that develops in the young when their intellectual and spiritual lives are empty are more likely the culprits to binge drinking.

But Amethyst Initiative creator John McCardell Jr, who also is the founder of another group dedicated to lowering the drinking age called Choose Responsibility, would disagree with the above analysis and claim that people binge drink simply because they’re not allowed to drink with him or people his age. I’m nutshelling his position to be sure, but what these college presidents are advocating is for kids fresh out of high school to be able to accompany them to a bar. What they want is a wink and nudge college system where people like McCardell would be able to abdicate of their responsibility to provide guidance to their charges while every campus dorm becomes a set for Girls Gone Wild.

There’s something unseemly about people who work in a college advocating making it legal to get freshmen girls drunk. Maybe you have to spend as much time on college campuses as I did to really see it, but some of you know exactly what is driving this “initiative” to break down what I think is a good barrier between young adults not yet ready to make responsible decisions and the boomers who won’t grow up and stop trying to have sex with them.

But like I said, I’m biased toward staying sober so McCardell will say I’m just a prude. So will Robert Van Der Ohe though, and I’m sure he supports this nonsense.

M.A.D.D. is against this and they have some stats to back up their contention that raising the drinking age saved lives. The most important information they point to though, and key to understanding the nuances of the debate, is this SAMHSA study which shows that at least 40% of underage drinkers receive their alcohol free from a person over the age of 21. Or to translate: Old dudes like to get teens drunk to have sex with them.

There’s a site called Why 21 that also argues against lowering the drinking age.

Before the emails start I’d be fine with a lower drinking age if A) The people promoting it were honest about the facts of drinking and B) It wasn’t being pushed by some old dude from a state with liberal policies that have made it a haven for sex offenders which resulted in a higher rape rate. Pushing down the drinking age now will only give predators a larger pool of victims to prey on, and stop cops from arresting people prior to them committing a rape when found plying a teen with booze.

h/t Crime Scene KC

Victimless Crime File: Pot Smoking Trollop Leaves Children in Hot Car to Party in Van with Two Guys

christina-abreu-druggie-slut.jpg

I assume we all know what “partying” looks like when a girl is in a van with two guys with pot and coke:

CORAL GABLES, Fla. — A young woman was arrested on Monday for allegedly leaving her children in a hot van while she used drugs, police said.

Coral Gables police said 23-year-old Cristina Abreu was caught with two men in another vehicle that had marijuana and cocaine inside.

Officers said they found Abreu’s two children “sweating and crying” in the van, which was parked nearby. They said only the front passenger window was down.

Abreu was arrested and charged with two counts of child neglect.

But if pot was legal this wouldn’t have happened, right?

h/t D.D.

Victimless Crime File: Mary-Kate Olsen Demanding Police Immunity in Drug Probe?

mary-kate-olsen-boobs-upskirt-sex.jpg

Huh? The scarily thinner Olsen twin is demanding that police grant her immunity from any charges before she’ll talk to them about the tragic death of Heath Ledger:

Actress Mary-Kate Olsen has refused to answer questions from federal authorities investigating the accidental overdose that killed actor Heath Ledger until she receives immunity from prosecution, The New York Post reported.

The former child-star, famous for playing Michelle Tanner on “Full House,” was a close friend of Ledger’s and the first person called after her masseuse discovered Ledger’s body in his Soho apartment in January, The Post said.

But federal officials could force the actress to tell them details on the “Dark Knight” star’s drug use and events leading up to his death if they obtain a grand-jury subpoena.

One source told The Post that “everyone has been very eager to help, saying what a great guy Heath was, everyone except Mary-Kate, who has refused to speak.”

When Olsen got the call that Ledger — whose performance as the Joker in “The Dark Knight” has earned rave reviews — was dead, she reportedly failed to call authorities, and instead telephoned her body guards. According to The Post, they arrived just as paramedics got to the scene.

Ledger’s death was ruled an accidental drug overdose by medical examiners, caused by a combination of prescription drugs and the pain reliever OxyContin. According to The Post, the latter was likely received illegally.

Looks like America’s former sweetheart isn’t just using (as unconfirmed rumors claim) but maybe doing a little dealing on the side. Either that or she’s the kind of drug-addicted moron who hands out pain killers to her friends without a care in the world.

Is there a cover-up being orchestrated? The Post seems indicate that the feds think so and were not happy with the NYPD’s decision to let Olsen off the hook:

… And NYPD investigators closed their probe without interviewing Olsen because, they said, they got all the cooperation they needed from others. That decision, however, surprised some observers, considering Olsen’s role as a potential witness.

Instead of calling emergency responders after getting the call from her masseuse, Olsen telephoned her bodyguards in the Big Apple, telling them to race to Ledger’s Broome Street home, where they arrived just as paramedics got to the scene.

The US Drug Enforcement Administration, which opened an investigation to determine the sources of Ledger’s drugs, was not as sanguine as the NYPD about talking to the 4-foot-11, 90-pound Olsen.

The feds contacted her lawyer, Michael Miller, several times recently seeking her cooperation, but Miller has told the feds Olsen won’t be interviewed unless she gets immunity, exercising her constitutional rights.

According to sources, all of the drugs in Ledger’s body and discovered nearby in prescription bottles were legally obtained from two physicians – with the exception of OxyContin, a powerful painkiller.

Investigators “are trying to ID the source of the OxyContin,” a source said. “Did it come from a dealer, from a friend? If he had a bottle from a friend, was it taken by someone else before police responded? That is what is trying to be determined.”

The DEA probers were also aggressive with the NYPD, the sources said, and were forced to threaten to obtain a grand-jury subpoena before getting the department’s Ledger files.

An NYPD spokesman said the department never balked at handing over the files and did so after receiving a routine federal administrative subpoena.

Asked whether he asked for immunity for his client, Olsen’s lawyer said, “We are not going to comment on whether there is a criminal investigation,” and declined to speak further.

So it looks like Heath Ledger isn’t the only victim of the drug culture in this story. Olsen is clearly in some way involved in something which the feds will find out about. This is just another victimless crime though, right? Only Heath Ledger was hurt by his drug use, right? Not his child, not his family and certainly not Mary-Kate Olsen who’s quite possibly on her way to jail.

Though because she’s rich and a celebrity she won’t go to jail, but if it turns out she gave/sold the Oxycontin to Ledger that helped killed her friend she’ll have to live with that the rest of her life.

Victimless Crime File: Coked Up Muslim Kills and Dismembers 17-Year-old British Girl

Here’s a story of drug fueled violence with a taliban-esque twist in Brazil:

GOIANIA, Brazil (AP) – The Brazilian man accused of dismembering a British teenager and stuffing her torso in a suitcase told The Associated Press on Friday that he doesn’t remember most of what happened the night she died because he was high on cocaine.

“I don’t remember much,” Mohamed D’Ali Carvalho Santos said in an interview through the bars of his jail cell. “I had used too much drugs.”

Earlier Friday, however, Santos denied that he killed her in comments he made to reporters after returning from a trip with police to guide them to the remote area where he allegedly tossed Cara Marie Burke’s head and limbs from a bridge.

“It wasn’t me,” Santos said. “I deny it.”

Police say the 20-year-old already confessed to killing 17-year-old Burke on July 25 before cutting up her body because she threatened to tell Santos’ parents he was a drug dealer and addicted to cocaine.

Police inspector Jorge Moreira da Silva said Friday that authorities are searching for a man named Jorge accused of helping Santos dispose of the body parts, but said that the man is not suspected of taking part in Burke’s killing.

Burke’s torso was found Monday in the suitcase on the banks of a river in Goiania, about a two-hour drive from the Brazilian capital, Brasilia.

During the trip to the site where the body parts were dumped, Santos became angry with reporters after he was asked if he remembered where he tossed the remains.

“I threw her in your house,” he snarled.

Interested Participant notes that while the theory that Mohamad killed Burke because she threatened to tell his parents of his drug use is popular, there are reports that Mohamad was actually a Brazilian citizen who was angry Burke wouldn’t marry him so he could get U.K. citizenship.

Lionheart has long chronicled the violent subculture of Muslim drug gangs and this killing is as violent and misogynistic as anything he’s documented.

Victimless Crime File: Natural Born Killer?

eric-tavulares-natural-born-killer-murder.jpg

Eric Tavulares murdered his childhood sweetheart Lauren Aljubouri after watching about half of the overrated Natural Born Killers, a movie he claims to have watched 10-20 times. While it is a titillating part of the crime, it is overshadowing the likely true cause of Tavulares’ senseless murder of his friend, a history of drug use that is buried in the articles about the crime which instead decide to imply his viewing habits caused him to freak out.

From 620 WTMJ:

According to the criminal complaint, Tavulares told police that and Lauren, who he’d been dating off and on since 6th grade, had been watching the movie Natural Born Killers on Friday night. He told police he’d seen the movie about 10 to 20 times. Sometime in the middle of the movie, Tavulares says the two stopped the movie and went into the bedroom.

Tavulares told police that the two got into bed while holding a conversation. At some point, Tavulares says something caused him to “switch mentally” and he rolled over onto Lauren and began straddling her. He says he then started to choke her.

There was a struggle, at some point, Tavulares says he began to choke her from behind.

Tavulares says at some point he realized Lauren was dead and he jumped off her and then got up and started giving her CPR.

If convicted, Tavulares faces up to 60 years in prison.

He has two previous convictions in a case that accused him of drug use and one that accused him of resisting an officer.

Tavulares has a history of violence due to drug use, something that many reports gloss over but is important to understanding the crime. At 18 he already had two convictions for drugs and had resisted an officer; he was a ticking time bomb. A movie didn’t make that happen, a society that winks at drug abuse did.

Which isn’t to say that his obsession with Natural Born Killers, a movie produced by racist harpy Jane Hamsher of the Firedoglake, isn’t important at all. Natural Born Killers, the precursor to Rob Zombie’s awful House of a Thousand Corpses and The Devil’s Rejects, is an immature glorification of drug fueled violence directed and filmed in such a way as to only appeal to people who are high. I’d put forward that all three of the movies are only enjoyable when the audience is high.

Hamsher may claim Natural Born Killers was a social commentary on our obsession with violence but the truth is it’s a movie that feeds into the stunted and misanthropic impulses that are so prevalent in drug abusers. Natural Born Killers may pretend to be art but it’s little more than the Hollywood equivalent of rough sex pron, a niche film made to appeal to those who think violent sex gets a bad rap. And just as Zombie’s films tend to heroicize the villains in an attempt to give a thankfully small section of our society the artistic justification for their misogyny, anger and self-loathing, Natural Born Killers shows audiences a wider world that deserves to have the two main characters attack it. That presentation is designed to appeal to the Eric Tavulareses of the world.

The movie didn’t cause him to murder Lauren, but his love of the movie was a by-product of his devolving personality and drug addiction. Just as you can judge people who think Jackson Pollack was a genius as bleating art groupies who form their opinions by reading the Village Voice, a person who can sit through Killers twice, much less 10-20 times, is probably picturing himself in the Woody Harrelson role and has some issues with the rest of us.

Smoking Gun has the police report. JS Online has another take. Mahalo already has a very handy quick reference.