Nixzmary Brown was a little girl here in New York who was tortured for years and finally murdered by the degenerate wife beating child molester Caesar Rodriguez. The mother, an unassimilated immigrant who needed a translator at trial, was no prize either. She sat by as the seven year old was bound to chairs, sexually assaulted, and literally starved half to death before the man she so desperately loved murdered the girl in a savage attack. These two people need to be punished for their disgusting crimes.

And right now reporters from The New York Times and The NY post are hampering their prosecution. The question is why? From CSB:

The cases against Cesar Rodriguez and Nixaliz Santiago took another strange turn today as prosecutors attempted to subpoena two reporters who spoke with the defendants shortly after they were arrested and charged with killing Nixzmary Brown.

In separate jailhouse interviews conducted at Riker’s Island, both Rodriguez and Santiago related the events of that night to reporters.

[…]

Even though prosecutors have police interviews where Cesar details, in cold detail, what happened that night, defense attorneys have already begun to argue that the police questioned the him without giving him proper access to an attorney.

In Santiago’s case, her lawyers claim that police fed her the story she gave during police questioning, worried that they would not let her see her other children.

The two newspapers, The New York Times and The New York Post both are fighting the subpoenas, claiming that if reporters are required to speak about what they are told in interviews, that it could jeopardize their ability to cover future stories. It is believed that if people are worried that reporters will divulge information they learned in interviews that they will be more hesitant to speak with reporters.

Disgusting. These reporters are putting the image of reporting as “the noble profession” they’ve been cultivating before their civic and moral responsibilities. Read the whole post, which includes contact info for those of you who want to tell these two papers exactly what you think of their decision to put pretension ahead of justice for a seven year old murder victim.

So why are these reporters hampering the prosecution? The answer is simple: they care more about what their colleagues think of them than about that poor little girl.

Forget the dottering Grandpa’ routine, after seeing the third or fourth link to the official Ron Paul HQ on a White Nationalist forum I got the sneaking suspicion that Ron Paul is a miscreant swindler who trudges through the fever swamps of marginal libertarianism churning up the muck and mire of any puddle of fringe thought which he can pan for gold. He’ll reach out to any group, no matter how unseemly, if it means more money, attention and devotees for his Lyndon Larouche style political cult dedicated to carving out a position of real power for “pork barrel Paul” so he can live like a King from
the paranoid sweat of ten thousand delusional shut-ins.

One such shut in going by the handle “John Knight” has been posting fallacious defenses of Paul on several Red Alerts posts. Here’s a taste:

Ron Paul points out that for three quarters of its life, our government managed to function perfectly well, including all the government “services” you mention above, WITHOUT the IRS. He also points out that the U.S. Constitution does not give authority for the IRS, nor an income tax. There’s a huge difference between “helping widows and orphans”, and establishing a black welfare class which now costs us more than one TRILLION dollars each year in social transfer payments, which could not happen if the IRS were to be righteously outlawed–and created a criminal class which is a far greater threat to the average citizen than 1.2 billion Muslims of the world, combined.

He conveniently leaves a link to his “Christian Party” website which I assume is endorsing Ron Paul. Paul may not be excited about an endorsement by this particular group however as it exposes Paul’s appeal is not so much to libertarians as rape loving racists who hate Jews and think the New World Order is secretly calling the shots in America.

Here’s a selection of his best hits:

He calls for a boycott of companies whose ads feature Black models. As he says, “once we see black we never go back!”

He hosts a poll to see how much support there is to exile Black people.

He believes Jews are “tapping” our computers. Also the Mafia are all Jews.

Dylan Klebold participated in the Columbine Massacre because he was a Jew who believed in the Holocaust Hoax.

Women’s Suffrage made America a totalitarian state!

I could go on but literally every page on this bizarrely hateful website is full of asinine conspiracy theories and racist rambling. The worst part of his site is dedicated to proving that most rape reports are false and a feminist conspiracy. It’s an especially creepy read on his rainbow decorated site which looks as if it was designed by a Strawberry Short cake afficianado.

So why does Paul attract this sort of degenerate to his flock anyway? Why can’t Paul supporters meet my challenge to identify a rational, normal self sufficient adult who isn’t a conspiracy theorist or living at home? Is it just fate, or is Paul a grifter who grooms these people as followers because they’re easier to bilk and will work for free promoting him?

As of yet, his campaign has no comment.