The New Misogyny: Bree Olson Voices Political Opinion, “Liberal” Followers Call Her Whore


In a repeat of the Gauge incident, “liberal” porn watchers have shown their true colors on Twitter (where Bree Olson promotes) early this morning when adult film actress Bree Olson had the temerity to disagree with them over politics, and worse, admit to watching Fox News. This time Twitter kept the length of the misogynist attacks on Olson short and to the point with “men” (and I use the term loosely) telling her they could “no longer get hard for her” or that she should “shut up and Suck some more C#$%” while sobbing into their commemorative Obama t-shirts.

The point here is that yet again “liberal” tolerance is tested and comes up sorely lacking. Bree Olson is expected to cater to the liberal male’s fragile and feminized ego to such an extent that she can’t, in real life, express an opinion different than theirs without drawing venom so vile that it would be at home in the mouth of a rapist. Which is ironic since these same men no doubt claim to be Feminists but invest a great deal of their emotional lives in watching a woman they will never have be taken by a man that they can’t measure up to. I’d say something about Freud here, but is there really a need?

Bree Olson is, no matter how you feel about pornography (and I myself think modern porn has strayed away from libertine hedonism and into pathological degradation), an American who deserves as much respect as anyone else. Why is it that people who claim they are “for women” don’t think the same way?

Miley Cyrus: Exploited Teen or Hipster Douchebag?


I’m going to go with a 70/30 split here, because frankly at around 17 young Ms. Cyrus is old enough to know that the Teen Choice Awards aren’t the place to practice your pole dancing, but I’m pretty sure it wasn’t Cyrus’ idea to introduce the ‘tweens watching this fiasco which also featured a woman most teens would never have heard of (Kathy Griffin) holding hands with a degenerate no teen should be alone with (Levi Johnston) as a precursor to what wasn’t so much an award show but a virtual molestation of every child watching.

Now look, I’m no prude but I prefer my strippers to be a) of age and b) out of sight of anyone who still watches the Teen Choice Awards, an audience primarily made up of 12-year-old girls and pedophiles. What exactly is the purpose of a pole dance by a 17-year-old girl who looks 15 years old, aside from providing spank material to perverts and creating some very difficult situations for teachers this fall when all the 4th graders start doing their “Miley” dance for the talent show?

One purpose I can think of is to stroke the ego of a petulant teen millionaire who thought it’d be “ironic” and “cool” to mock the millions of women in America who didn’t have the benefit of a celebrity father and pedophilic pop culture to make them rich, and support themselves, their children and often some deadbeat girlfriend through swinging around a pole surrounded by people so jaded and bored with life that she has to hang from the pole like a bat to get tips. Another purpose is to add a few years to the career of a girl who should be looking into college by tarting her up so that the legions of parasites whose business is selling Miley Cyrus don’t have to slap lipstick on some 8th grader and get Vanity Fair to photograph her in a thong. After all, such things take years of grooming, ask any child molester.

But what this boils down to is the kind of idiotic move all teens with no proper guidance pull when they’re trying to be seen as an adult but never had much opportunity to mature. Frankly I’ve seen worse, but nothing so public and that’s the point. Cyrus still markets herself to children yet wants to put on some low rent go-go show designed to make adults uncomfortable, children confused and titillate the hipster crowd with her “empowering embrace” of what can politely be called burlesque only because of the sad state of burlesque shows these days, which are little more than vanity driven passion plays for trust fund babies to get back at their absentee fathers. Cyrus’ performance was much more suggestive than most burlesque and that’s where some adult should have stepped in and said no. I mean by the gods who is her agent? Roman Polanski?

Like I said, I’m no prude I just prefer my adult entertainment to be made for and by adults. If Cyrus wants to strip than let me know when she’s 25 or so and I’ll go to the Pink Rhino to catch her feature dancing, but let’s keep the kids out of the loop on this one.

Democrat Operative with Ties to Ted Strickland and Hillary Clinton Pimped Out Teen Girls Online

Robert “Eric” McFadden is the founder of Catholics for Kerry and was involved with the controversial (and heretical from a traditional Catholic perspective) Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. McFadden also worked as the head of Clinton’s Catholic outreach program last year during the election, and was Ohio Governor Ted Strickland’s director of Faith Based Initiatives for some time.

McFadden was also a sexual degenerate who was pimping out teenage girls on Craigslist:

A middle-aged man was arrested and taken into custody by Columbus police officers for crimes related to online prostitution. Robert E. McFadden, 46, allegedly traded information relating to online prostitutes and escorts who plied their trade on the city streets. Charges in the pending case also state a 17-year-old minor was one of the “sex for hire” participants. Law enforcement officers state McFadden reportedly offered raffle tickets for $10 each in order to win and evening with a prostitute.

McFadden allegedly created reviews of individual streetwalkers and personal escorts and sold the reviews of their performances online. The “hooker review” website has been pulled from the World Wide Web, leaving many searching aimlessly for a glimpse of the X-rated performance chart. According to the details available about McFadden’s lascivious love low-down, customers could post comments about their personal experiences with the sex workers. Possible child pornography charges may be forthcoming due to the age of at least one of the prostitutes.

Yowza. Someone’s going to be doing like a million Hail Marys. McFadden apparently made a living being the official Democratic Party Catholic as this report from the Catholic News Agency ably shows:

The former director of the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives for the governor of Ohio was arrested Wednesday for his involvement in an online prostitution ring.  Eric McFadden, who has also formerly served as the president of the organization Catholics for Faithful Citizenship and spokesperson for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, will face seven prostitution-related charges tomorrow in court.

Eric McFadden, 46, the former head of the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives for Governor of Ohio, Ted Strickland, was arrested this morning and faces two counts of promoting prostitution, two counts of pandering obscenity involving a minor, two counts of pandering obscenity involving a nude minor and one count of compelling prostitution, Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien told the Springfield News-Sun.

The News-Sun also quoted Keith Daily, Governor Strickland’s press secretary who described the situation as “very sad, shocking and appalling.”

McFadden’s faith outreach has not been limited to the Ohio governor’s office.  In 2004, McFadden worked for Catholics for Kerry and in 2005, served as the president for the organization, Catholics for Faithful Citizenship.  In 2006, he was a spokesperson for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, and more recently, he was Hillary Clinton’s lead Catholic outreach organizer as the State Faith & Values Outreach Director during the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.

According to NBC 4 in Columbus, Ohio, detectives suspect McFadden was involved in a “hooker-review” site that led to the creation of a Brewery District brothel.

Here’s how we know he was never a particularly bright man:

McFadden used complex encoded postings on Craigslist that would look like useless or corrupted data, in which he would embed the information of the woman available, the type of sex interaction she would be willing to perform and the place to meet her. Paradoxically, McFadden’s code name in his transactions was “mcfaddencatholic.”

Looking for some lefty hypocrisy?

McFadden who has been a supporter of John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama described his Catholic outreach in 2007 to PBS’ Religion and Ethics Newsweekly as giving “a voice to Catholics so they can stand up and say, ‘I am a Catholic Democrat, and I’m proud and these are the principles that I believe in.’”

Additionally, he was a member of the Knights of Columbus and reached the 4th order.  Last year, he penned a letter to the Knights of Columbus asserting that Supreme Knight Carl Anderson was leading Catholics astray by suggesting that Catholics could not vote for pro-abortion candidates.

“Carl Anderson should resign as Supreme Knight so the good work of the Knights of Columbus can continue without the stain of partisan politics,” he wrote.

While he wrote this he was hiring and pimping out underage prostitutes.

Lest you think the Liberal hypocrisy ends with him Newsbusters points out that the left-leaning Columbus-Dispatch actually scrubbed the story from their site, while The American Catholic catches Huffington Post first trying to claim McFadden was a “GOPer” until they were called out in the comments. Now party affiliation is nowhere to be found, but the Huffpo commenters are enthusiastically calling for the legalization of pimping out children.

It will come as a shock to you I’m sure to find that a person who was pimping out a teenage girl may have had a history of online sexual harassment aimed at Pro-life women. Carol McKinley puts forward the theory that Ted Strickland’s people knew McFadden was a degenerate and got rid of him just before all this broke loose. Knarfoh has examples of his postings. Pro Ecclesia has a list of comments McFadden has made on his site, which are telling.

McFadden also apparently went by the name God of Thunder. He met his victim in an online chat room, groomed her, then “raffled” her off to men.

The MSM will be bringing you all the details in the coming weeks I’m sure.

h/t RightWing Sparkle.

The New Misogyny: Carrie Prejean a “Hypocrite” for Incredibly Tame Modeling Photos

I’m going to do you a favor before you head over to the spyware infested scam site parading as a gossip blog that is claiming to a have “scandalous” picture of the left’s new favorite punching bag Carrie Prejean and give you a picture that is actually equally as racy:


Now imagine she was turned away from you, topless but with her arms positioned so that you get just a glimpse of side boob, the same amount that you would see if she was wearing this top and there’s your “racy” photo. You’ll excuse me if I don’t seem particularly impressed but I started out my blogging career on a Wrestling/Sci-Fi blog where I posted pictures of models like this:

tara-bush-hardcore-schoolgirl.jpg (Model/Indy Pro-Wrestler Tara Bush)

Lefty activists live in their own little world where people on the right are all the preacher from Footloose. I’m far to the right of most people and I have promoted models and artists that are much more risque than Prejean’s Victoria’s Secret inspired “racy” photo. I, and most people I know, understand three things that people attacking Prejean are hoping the general public are too stupid to know:

  1. Models often take off their clothes for particular photo shoots.
  2. Christians aren’t religiously prohibited from modeling.
  3. There’s nothing wrong with artistic, or non-artistic, nudity.

The only problem I would have with this supposedly racy photo is that the girl was apparently 17 when it was taken, but I don’t remember liberals mocking Jessica Biel when she posed topless at 17. Who’s the real hypocrite?

Always ready to propagandize for some lefty cause celebre, Matt Lauer, who claimed the world would be ending about now a few years ago, used his dreadful morning televison program to claim conservatives would be disgusted by Prejean’s photos. Lauer even claims the photo is too graphic to run on air, even though it’s simply a Victoria’s Secret style underwear modeling shot.  As Allahpundit points out, NBC had no problem airing self-glorifying videos made by the Virgina Tech killer, so the sudden onset of Victorian sensibilities at the Peacock is suspect, to say the least.

Only the most partisan flack would think that Lauer claiming this fairly tame photo was too hot for TV was not a cynical ploy designed to make people think she basically made porn by a news organization which thinks its viewers are too dumb to be able to find a copy of the photo with a Google image search and see for themselves that Lauer was lying.

This profound disrespect for the people watching is a part of the overall misanthropy that has become acceptable in society, especially by the left I would put forward, as are the misogynist attacks on women launched by men who hate anyone who doesn’t kowtow to them. This attack was of course kicked off by professional douchebag Perez Hilton, who also recently called Tila Tequila a whore for having a body cast done at a cancer charity. In that post I point out that Hilton’s brand of class envy based misogyny has become an accepted part of the public discourse and it is something that men (and no matter how affected his behavior, Perez Hilton is still first and foremost a man and thus, I feel, should be judged by a certain standard of behavior) should be ashamed to partake in.

In this case he is leading a movement to call her a hypocrite as if models can’t have religious views on marriage. This is silly. I’m a Republican and I support gay marriage (or I did, after the MLK memorial service was interrupted by ACT UP I decided to put my energy into causes where the people have some class) which doesn’t make me a hypocrite. If I was a Christian and supported gay marriage I would be a hypocrite because the Bible does in fact spell out what constitutes a marriage. Christians can support a state sanctioned civil union called a marriage, but Marriage is a sacrament in Christianity, so to them having gays receive the sacrament of marriage would be like holding a rave in a church.

In other words, Prejean isn’t a hypocrite, she’s a woman who works as a model who’s drawn the ire of people who believe that a woman is only deserving of respect when they parrot the ideas they believe in. She is yet another woman targeted by a misogynist to whom society gives a free pass because he lisps and has the mannerisms of an 8-year-old girl. My godfather was a gay man, and he was a man’s man. He comported himself with dignity, class and respect. He did not accept that being gay meant living in a state of perpetual effeminate adolescence and he never delved into misogyny of any type. He and most gay men are ashamed of Perez Hilton being held up as a spokesman for them, by straights of course.

The mincing effeminate act that Perez Hitlon puts on may charm the New Yorkers who think of gays as some sort of urban elves whose sole purpose in life is to entertain them, but it does more to hurt the cause of gays who want to be treated equally than a thousand Carrie Prejeans. Perez Hilton creates an image of gay men not as adult men who like other men, but immature “men” who hate women and seek to degrade, humiliate and abuse them at any opportunity. Cattiness is wearisome in women, in men it’s unseemly at best.

This is not keen insight. Every observer sees this and even Matt Lauer knows Prejean did nothing wrong, which is why he resorted to lying on air about how racy her photo was. Lauer, and people like him, will do anything to prove he supports gay rights even trample the rights of a woman. Perez Hilton is a rallying point for leftists to show their support for gay marriage, even though he is clearly not only wrong but a horrible person who is doing a disservice to gays by making a living being a cartoonish caricature of one.

So who in this scenario is really the hypocrite?

The New Misogyny: Tila Tequila Called Whore for Doing Charity Work


Call me old-fashioned but I’m not big on calling women “whore” or some permutation of the word, especially women who are trying to do something good for someone. To me the only time it might be appropriate to make such a reference is when a woman has done something especially horrid, like Shana Brown, a woman I happily referred to as a gutterslut when she was caught drugging her 13-year-old daughter so her boyfriend could rape her.

Outside of that level of depravity I think it’s disgusting to call a woman a slut or whore. I don’t care if they are Internet models, porn stars, strippers or the girl you know who is cheating on her boyfriend, it is immature misogyny to call a woman a whore simply because you happen to not like or approve of some facet of their life. It is a crass and unmanly position to take in all but the most extreme circumstances.

Shamefully there are those that disagree and happily attempt to degrade any woman that draws their petty ire. During the ’08 elections I wrote about adult film actress Gauge suffering outrageous personal attacks from her “fans” after writing what was essentially Republican boiler plate about supporting John McCain because she was pro-life and pro-Second Amendment. In that case there was a hypocritical element to the attacks because she was abused with comments like this:

Hey Gauge, I just watched a video of you fucking 5 guys. Please tell us again how wrong irresponsible sex is. I’ve seen a lot of your work but you never had the guys wear condoms. Don’t you think it’s irresponsible to engage in unsafe sex? How many STD’s have you had? Considering how big a skank you are, I bet you’ve had a lot. Well since your boy McCain is crashing and burning, I can’t wait for the election. Obama is going to win in a landslide.

This of course from someone who watches her movies. This liberal, as I said on that post, viewed women like Gauge as de facto sex slaves who perform deviant acts for their pleasure and aren’t entitled to be anything more that a girl on a DVD doing things that are marketed to people whose self-loathing and anger makes them want to see attractive women degraded. I don’t like modern pornography, which has replaced hedonism with humiliation and decadence with degradation, but the people who attacked Gauge are fans of that. They are the ones who should be ashamed, not Gauge.

Now in a similar incident Tila Tequila was apparently called a whore by “Perez Hilton”after pictures of her in lingerie and a trenchcoat showed up on gossip blogs. The rotund celebrity parasite didn’t provide his emotionally stunted followers the context for these photos apparently. It seems the world’s most famous Internet model was raising money for a breast cancer charity:

Think what you want of Tila Tequila, and I happen to think she exemplifies Capitalism and American exceptionalism as I’ve said before, but here’s a woman taking time to help the Keep-a-Breast foundation and while doing that she is called a whore by not just a narcissistic star-stalker but by the rabble of ne’er-do-wells who seem to travel from website to website calling this person who they’ll never meet and will have no effect on their lives vile names. My question is why?

There’s an essay by Anton LaVey (I think it’s in The Devil’s Notebook but I’m not sure) in which he examines misogyny and comes to the conclusion that the misogynist is competing with women for male attention, and his anger derives from his failure to win that competition. Using such now eyebrow raising phrases as “closeted homosexual” for men like this he implies that they are predominantly stunted people who live in a permanent state of semi-girlish pre-adolescence. With the ever more misogynist pornography, attacks on female political figures and and the abandonment of the ideas of womanhood being something to respect I think this essay has become more important than ever.

Were this simply a spat between two celebrities this story would be meaningless but Perez Hilton’s brand of envious misogyny has become an acceptable stance for men to have regarding women. One need only check the comments on some YouTube video or article that allows comments to see men partaking in what is essentially gender specific class envy where women like Tila Tequila are claimed to be deserving of abuse simply because they are successful.

The same jealousy and misanthropy that drives class warfare drive the hatred of pretty, rich and famous women who a large segment of our society believes are “whores” for simply living their own lives. That would be bad enough itself but in this instance a woman doing a good deed, one that anyone who has the opportunity to do should do, is being attacked for no other reason than that it is now acceptable to treat women poorly in our society.

Call me “Conservative” but I believe in respecting women, even ones you may not agree with. I don’t believe in infantilizing women by any means, I think respecting a person means treating them as individuals equal to yourself, but I simply won’t accept that it is O.K. for a man to call a woman a whore simply because she has a photo of herself in lingerie when she’s basically a lingerie model. I don’t think it’s acceptable to encourage degradation in porn by buying the mot extreme forms of it, then claim adult film actresses are skanks for working in the industry which you created. I think men should reserve name calling for the Shana Browns of the world, not women who are simply minding their own business.

I’m not a misogynist. I like women, even ones I disagree with, and think that all are worthy of respect. But it seems that this is a minority view these days.

Update: Welcome Tila Tequila fans! Due to a surge in traffic to the site, comments are taking a few minutes to appear. Please be patient, and thanks for reading.