Surprise! Pat Buchanan Promotes Hitler Whitewash on White Supremacist Radio Show

And thus the Paleo-conservative complaints about “Neo-con dual loyalties” are finally put in their proper context. From The New Republic:

You read that right. On June 29th, MSNBC personality and three-time presidential candidate Pat Buchanan appeared on a neo-Nazi radio program to promote his new revisionist history of the Second World War, Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World. James Edwards is the host of the program “Political Cesspool,” the stated mission of which is to “represent a philosophy that is pro-White.” Edwards and his colleauges seek “to revive the White birthrate above replacement level fertility and beyond to grow the percentage of Whites in the world relative to other races” and believe that “Secession is a right of all people and individuals. It was successful in 1776 and this show honors those who tried to make it successful in 1865.”

Read the rest. James Kirchick of The New Republic makes the case that this incident is so egregious that Buchanan’s employ by MSNBC is unseemly at best. I happen to think Pat’s views on Jews and America fit right in at MSNBC.

Gateway Pundit blogged this and has been following the Buchanan implosion for months. As usual Gateway is on the forefront of the news.

Political Cesspool bills itself as the premiere “Conservative Populist” radio program. Conservative populism is apparently a euphemism for neo-Confederacy and Nazi sympathizing. Populism appeals to the basest tribal feelings of Americans and Buchanan is now a prime example of that.

Thanks for Making Black Folk Look So Damn Good LaToya Bell

On Labor Day a group of up to 20 “men” and boys gang raped an 11-year-old girl with the assistance of a 16-year-old girl and another adult woman who was there at the time. What About Our Daughters has been covering the case and has just posted about one of the degenerate pervert’s sentencing hearings. Some of the younger rapists have gotten off basically scot-free with a few years in Juvenile Detention and the Supreme Court has ensured that the adults need not worry about the punishment they truly deserve.

Within this horror story we have a quote from 22-year-old LaToya Bell, a friend of the gang-rapists and a woman who has some nuanced beliefs about gender equality and the validity of American social mores:

A number of women in the girl’s neighborhood said the males involved were good people who made bad decisions.

“Five years? Ten years? That’s ridiculous,” said LaToya Bell, 22, sitting on a porch with four others who nodded in agreement. “They (are) getting time for nothing. That girl, she knew what she was doing.”

“That girl” is an 11-year-old child who was gang raped. Even if she “knew what she was doing” what LaToya, with the full support of her four gutterslut friends, is saying is that rape, child molestation and sexual sadism with children is acceptable.

Forget for a second the self-loathing, violent homo-eroticism that is at the core of any man who participates in a gang-rape, the misogyny driven by jealousy of women stealing the attention of other men from the rapist that is the fuel for his libido, and the rank perverse evil of sexually violating pre-pubescent children. Let’s assume that LaToya fathoms none of this and just believes this girl “wanted” to have sex with a large group of men. What kind of sexual deviant is she that she thinks it’d be O.K. as long as the girl’s willing?

What sort of disgusting trollop not only blames the victim of of a gang rape for her brutalization, but thinks it’s perfectly normal for a) a group of up to 20 men to all have sex with one woman and b) adult men and teenagers to be attracted to and have sex with 11-year-olds? Besides trollops who are hell bent on ensuring that Black Americans look like barbarians I mean.

As a Bi-racial man I’ll just share a rueful head shake with Barack Obama the next time I run into him in Whole Foods and sigh heavily while saying “That’s why I moved out of East Orange.” He’ll agree while we amble through the bakery sampling the rosemary baguettes then he’ll say something like “but I’m still proud of where I came from,” perhaps a little too loudly if only to placate the shrewishly glaring Michelle.

Yeah, me too.

The commenters at What About Our Daughters aren’t as forgiving of Bell as the B-man and I are. And surprise! Francis Holland doesn’t give a crap about this girl being abused because he’s got more important things to blog about. Then again it fell to Ron Paul supporting N.A.U. truthers to rally for Jamiel’s Law because as Holland wrote to me in the comment thread on this post, caring about Black folk getting raped and killed won’t get Obama elected, reaching out to the people who do the killing will. Stay classy, Francis.

Also staying classy, the increasingly nutrooty blogger Charles Johnson whose readers at LGF are busily condemning anyone who thinks Dixiecrat parasite Jessie Helms was an evil bigot whose main “accomplishment,” besides benefiting from Reagan’s party discipline policy, was to break that same policy by attempting to rob fellow Republican Martin Luther King of his well earned holiday. The irony is that a woman named Natalie was just banned form LGF for “supporting fascists” because she simply agreed with someone Johnson doesn’t. Yet I don’t see the mass banning of lizards who loved Helms yet. Hypocrisy at it’s finest!

Another Hate Crime in NYC!

Liberalism on parade!

Four teenagers have been arrested on hate crime charges for throwing rocks at a school bus full of Jewish toddlers in a Brooklyn neighborhood with a volatile racial history, the police said on Friday.

The police said that three girls and one boy yelled epithets as they broke windows on the bus in Crown Heights last month. The children in the bus were not hurt. The teenagers arrested are black; each is 14.

The case is part of a string of events that have recently stirred tensions among black and Jewish residents in Crown Heights. Others episodes have included an assault on a black college student and an attack on an Orthodox Jewish teenager.

In 1991, clashes erupted in Crown Heights after a Jewish driver hit and killed a 7-year-old black boy. In the ensuing chaos, a 29-year-old Hasidic scholar was fatally stabbed.

NYC is having some serious problems with hate crimes. Liberals claim to promote tolerance and open mindedness but here we see in the most liberal city in the north eastern United State what happens when identity politics and “social justice” replace community and patriotism.

h/t Atlas Shrugs.

How to Talk to a Obama Supporter

Someone emailed me this and I thought it was amusing enough to post. Having some Obamists in my own family I find this YouTube channel to be extremely helpful in talking to people I can’t otherwise avoid. As a Bi-racial person the following video sums up my problems with Obama and his religious preferences:

[youtube]1nu48TgUVCo[/youtube]

Awesome. The ironic part of all this is that a Black man has to tell White people how to defend themselves from false charges of racism which are more likely to be leveled by racist White people. The same people who attack non-Whites people on a regular basis. Way to run a “post-racial” campaign Barack!

Lee Baca: “In L.A. Race Kills”

Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca, who many critics tend to forget is Latino himself, wrote a scintillating opinion piece in the L.A. Times taking to task the willful liberal ignorance of the escalating racist violence between Latinos and Blacks in California:

Conversations about race are fraught with emotion, confusion and controversy. But that doesn’t mean we should avoid or sidestep the issue.

As a Latino raised in East Los Angeles, and as the elected sheriff of Los Angeles County for the last decade, I have seen many sides of the race issue. I have lived it, in fact.

So let me be very clear about one thing: We have a serious interracial violence problem in this county involving blacks and Latinos.

Some people deny it. They say that race is not a factor in L.A.’s gang crisis; the problem, they say, is not one of blacks versus Latinos and Latinos versus blacks but merely one of gang members killing other gang members (and yes, they acknowledge, sometimes the gangs are race-based).

But they’re wrong. The truth is that, in many cases, race is at the heart of the problem. Latino gang members shoot blacks not because they’re members of a rival gang but because of their skin color. Likewise, black gang members shoot Latinos because they are brown.

[…]

Furthermore, we have evidence linking inmates who are known as “shot callers” directly to street shootings based entirely on race. These shot callers at Pitchess and elsewhere are affiliated with gangs, to be sure, and in many cases they may give the order to kill a particular person or a member of a particular gang. But if that person or gang cannot be found, the shot caller will often order the gunman to find someone — anyone — who is black or brown and shoot them instead. Gang affiliation does not matter. Only the color of the victim’s skin matters.

I would even take this a step further and suggest that some of L.A.’s so-called gangs are really no more than loose-knit bands of blacks or Latinos roaming the streets looking for people of the other color to shoot. Our gang investigators have learned this through interviews in Compton and elsewhere throughout the county. L.A.’s gang wars have long been complicated by drugs, territory issues or money. Now, it can also be over color.

I’ve long argued that same point, and have been largely ignored by the “Afrosphere” and Black bloggers who want to believe that White liberalism has their best interest at heart. Sorry my “brothers” (and sisters) but as Baca’s piece points out, White liberals are glad to bury their heads in the sand while Latino gangs shoot random Black folk.

And clearly the Black community allowing their response to this to be handled by low-life gang-bangers only makes the problem worse. Where are the Black leaders? Where are the protests? Where are Rev Wright and Farakhan on this one?

Maybe you should return to your Republican roots.